The following post will be part three in my exchange with 
Click here to catch up, if necessary.
So, again, I'm impressed with
Van nomadism is a good example. If apartment rent in a area is $10,000 per year and associated first realm expenses run $4,400, that represents twice the cost of $7,200 per year that you mention. Your possible capital formation is $7,200 per year compared to someone who would have $0 capital formation renting. In 10 years that’s a $72,000 difference, yet in both cases, the government will only see each case as below the $22,000 threshold for poverty. It’s a way of strategically using efficiency to build wealth.
See, for some reason, I had only been looking at these sorts of figures for van nomadism in the short term -- in other words, how much will I need to live the lifestyle? What you point out here is quite brilliant. I'm disappointed I didn't think it through all the way! (Hahaha, kidding!)
This also demonstrates van nomadism's efficacy as an interim lifestyle; not only can it be used as a tool for personal freedom in the here and now, but it's a stepping stone towards other goals; an individual can get their feet wet in an alternative lifestyle while also building wealth.
“Cold Trading” is something I have been thinking about for only a few months. It is no different I think than regular trading, the exception being there is no previous or traceable association with traders and no possible organization components that can be infiltrated. It would be widely decentralized, so trying to control it from a first realm perspective would be impossible, and inefficient to the point of first realm economic suicide.
Ahh, so I wasn't thinking far enough for this either. It's an interesting idea, I'm just having a hard time conceptualizing how this would function -- with it being decentralized in this manner, how would buyers and sellers get connected? How could a reputation system exist to prevent fraud and theft? I see your point on attempts to control it. It would be impossible. Kind of like trying to shut down Bitcoin. I'll have to ponder this more, too.
The digital realm is more difficult for me to observe. There is a vast quantity of data, security functions, software, communication that is occurring, so I am not yet comfortable thinking anything digital that hooks into a (first realm) communication network is untraceable.
This is a fair position. I remember Brian Sovryn saying something along the lines of (and I'm paraphrasing), "You can use all of the best encryption tools, but if the State wants to find you, there's not much you can do if you're targeted."
That said, the Second Realm replacement for the Internet, mesh networking, is all ready-to-go (as far as I understand it). All we need is a thick covering of nodes across so-called "America". I wouldn't expect that anytime soon, though.
So, in this next portion,
Q: When it comes to the S.R. Outposts in your opinion, what interaction (social/trading) would exist between them, if any?
A: This would be individual to individual exchange. Now what that exchange is, is a little undefined, I mean there is exchange of products, but there is also exchange of a service. The skill to trade that way will require proofs of quality, price and time that meet both traders individual standards.
The state has attempted to justified it’s existence by producing quality standards, and it has produced several generations of folks that can’t judge standards (or have the means to) on their own. In a sense, the state has socialized quality control and pricing. Cold trading seizes that ability away from the first realm. I fully understand it will take innovation to achieve that ability.
My Response: That's what I figured. Great points.
Q: Is your proposal of S.R. Outposts an attempt to further decentralize the effort in building Second Realms?
A: The way I look at humanity, I don’t ignore that we have diversity. Freedom for some is not the same as freedom for others. My concept of freedom is based primarily on individual constructs. Other folks ideas of freedom are based on social constructs. That’s not to say there is some overlap between social constructs and individual constructs. I think we all have preferences for variable quantities of each.
It’s just that some will prefer more individual constructs, while others will prefer more social constructs. If we just took a group of people and started building second realm, I think what we would see is a social construct for the socially inclined and outposts for those individually inclined.
Decentralization only works to the point it starts seeing the more socially inclined defect out of the second realm. At that point it starts excluding half the political landscape of second realm. If we only make up 1/3 of the political landscape (as is seen in the map), then excluding the social construct would decrease second realm to only 1/6 of the total area.
So even though the social construct can be infiltrated, there is a risk versus inclusion problem. It can be solved by the social construct being able to collapse itself, and rebuild, but that is a lot to ask of folks that store their value in the social construct. That is part of the problem I haven’t yet resolved.
My Response: So, I think I understood what you were saying. Decentralization really only happens when the social construct version is dropped in pursuit of the individual outposts (although, it would still be super decentralized, just not as much as the outposts).
Hm. I see what you mean regarding your solution, but let me posit this: basically, the "social construct" of the Second Realm is that all of the participants respect property rights and autonomy. That wouldn't have to be "collapsed" in the event of infiltration, emergency, etc. They may have to change temporary autonomous zones or relocate, but I think that should be the expectation for someone interesting in joining or building Second Realms.
In other words, the scenery may change, but the principles remain. I'll have to think about this more.
Q: Digital Second Realms exist and have for some time. What impact does your mapping have on those, if any?
A: This is a tough question. It somewhat appears that these things start out as having high degrees of freedom, but as time marches on they are always infiltrated by the first realm. I use the term ‘social’ in many different ways, and it isn’t meant to be abrasive to socially inclined people, it’s just that when I see a social construct, I typically default to looking at how it will be infiltrated.
What I think occurs is that a digital social construct may be innovated, constructed and implemented on the social side of second realm, but the infiltration will slowly pull it upward on the Y-axis into the first realm. It’s another one of those problems where I don’t see a solution.
My Response: Good observations.
So, I'm impressed again with the quality of your responses and the thought that you've put into the Second Realm,
For the rest of you, I hope you found this valuable! Please leave your thoughts below! How do we build the Second Realm(s)?
