Should we punish the bear when it catches a salmon? The hawk when it snatches a lizard? Certainly this article is well done and has provoked many thoughts, but the bit on the NAP applying to animals could use more explaining. If there was no inter-sentient-species aggression, wouldn't the food chain have capped off at snails and minnows? I understand that vegan diets could be legitimate for the world population, and I find no need to argue the "what about agressing plants" type position because I find that most definitely ridiculous, but where is the line drawn for things like insects? If you could point toward some literature on the subject, it would be greatly appreciated.
RE: Vegan Anarchy (Part II) The Non-Aggression Principle applied to animals