AA77 Before Impact - The Flight and the Calls That Redefined the Narrative

Source: https://mysticbazaar.substack.com/p/aa77-before-impact-the-flight-and

Welcome to my deep dive into American Airlines 77 & The Pentagon.Before starting this dive I had never really looked into AA77 or what had actually happened at the Pentagon, but even though it is the least documented part of the 9/11 story its full of lots of contradictions and coincidences. In this article I’m going to cover the Airport, passengers and phone calls.American Airlines flight 77 (AA77) was a Boeing 757-223 - tail number N644AA. It was departing from Dulles on route to Los Angeles and had 6 crew members and 58 passengers.AA77 was scheduled to take off at 8.10am but actually departed at 8.20am. The flights transponder was turned off around 8.56am and was hijacked around 8.54am.Only 2 passengers were reported to have made phone calls, both using an airfone.AA77 was said to be travelling 530mph and crashed into the Pentagon at 9.37:46am, killing all 64 people on board and 125 Pentagon personnel. The plane disintegrated on impact and the fire burned for over an hour.If AA77 left Dulles normally and without any issues, there should be a nice clear paper trail of evidence that would confirm passengers who boarded, who boarded them, gate the flight left from, witness statements, CCTV, departure times and ACARS data. But with AA77 there is practically nothing.In short the paper trail that should verify AA77 and the passengers isn’t there. There was also 300 hours of CCTV footage collected from Dulles Airportmwhich would confirm who definitely boarded the flight and where, but we only have footage of the alleged hijackers. There is only evidence that 22 of the actual passengers were even at Dulles that day, 42 passengers and staff members were not seen.For an indepth analysis on which passengers were seen at Dulles and who wasn’t then check out Mark Conlon’s Substack (911 Planes Research) where you will find a whole section on AA77.A few staff members at Dulles witnessed AA77s presence at Dulles. I have included the few statements that are available below…Ticket Agent Brown checked in a few passengers, only into first class and didn’t check in any Arab males. No mention of what Gate.Goodwin’s 302 - As the refuler, he says he fueled aa77 at Gate 26 and saw the flight pushed back and begin taxiing. He didn’t interact with any passengers or crew.Villasenor 302 - He was part of the catering service and prepared the setups for aa77. He was speaking with Wendy (LNU) who was collecting boarding passes from the passengers.Villasenor’s 302 PART 2 - He noticed 4 passengers had not yet boarded close to departure. He also later states that one checked in passenger never showed at the gate. After learning AA77 had crashed he tretrieved the passenger printout he had been using.Turner 302 PART 1 - She confirmed that AA77 was at gate 26 and that her role was to inspect the plane was ready before passengers and crew arrived.Turner 302 PART 2 - Turner later states she did not come back to the flight and see any of the passengers boarding or crew on the flight.While witnesses can confirm the aircraft’s presence and some boarding activity no one can identify the hijackers boarding, which remains unsupported by any direct testimony or documented record. Vaughn Allex is the only AA employee who ever claimed that he personally checked in the hijackers. Below is short interview that Vaughn Allex did He states that 2 of the hijackers arrived late for AA77 and they were in a rush, he had trouble taking their payment so he manually pushed them through so they wouldn’t miss the flight.But this version of events immediately doesn’t add up.The Official Story says the hijackers were early, not late. It states that they passed through security smoothly and were some of the first people to board the flight.However Villasenor’s statement (also above) said he saw passengers boarding and noticed 4 men had not boarded yet close to departure, which would suggest the same as Vaughn Allex.That is 3 different versions now, but…The hijackers were supposedly pulled for extra security - so how were they early and lateCAPPS flagged some of the hijackers for extra screening which should have delayed them, documented them, drawn attention and created timestamped records. However no records have ever been released and no AA employee mentions performing or witnessing any such screening.The Dulles CCTV time Makes the Contradictions Even SharperOver 300 hours of CCTV footage was collected from Dulles, however only 3-4minutes has ever been released. This shows the hijackers going through security, and the time is 7.18am-7.36am depending on which hijacker is shown. This was long before boarding, long before departure, they were not running late to the counter and weren’t in a rush.The timestamped CCTV contradicts Vaughn Allex’s late-hijacker check-in story entirely. It also contradicts the idea they were the last men lingering at the gate before take off.And there is no CCTV of the ticket counterthe gate areathe boarding queuethe jetwaythe hijackers actually boarding the planeAllex becomes even more discredited when he states in the interview above that he booked a good friend of this MJ Booth onto AA77. There is no Booth on any AA77 passenger manifest, no Booth in the Pentagon casualty list and no Booth in Arlington’s 9/11 records. The woman shown in the news report appears to be an unrelated Arlington Cemetery image. This means Allex not only gives a boarding timeline that contradicts every other witness but he also recalls a passenger who does not exist in any official record, raising serious questions about the reliability of his entire account.The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) keeps official records of every plane departure in the US. This includes information like scheduled time, actual departure, wheels off time, and tail number. Thanks to Mark Conlon for the below image - 911 Planes ResearchAA77 is missing from the BTS record for 9/11.BTS Data - which has now been removed from their website,As you can see in the image above, AA77 is shown with having an UNKNOWN tail number, UNKNOWN destination and no recorded departure, taxi-out or wheels off time!! There is no data to confirm that AA77 actually left the gate on 9/11. There are other AA flights for the same day that have full data, so the system was working. So if AA77 took off like the official narrative claims, why does the federal database show no evidence of it taking off at all??The above transcript shows that AA77 took off without any problems.AA77s transponder was turned off at 8.56am and disappeared from radar entirely. For a while the FAA thought it might still be flying towards Kentucky - but FAA logs show AA77 reappearing again at 10.40am, which is long after the official crash time of 09.38am.The above screenshots are from FAA and ATC transcripts and they clearly show that everyone was still tracking AA77 several hours after the supposed crash. And even by the afternoon AA77 was still being classed as missing.With AA77 still being reported as airborne long after 9.37am what crashed into the Pentagon. Dulles TRACON picked up a fast moving, low altitude, unidentified blip that was heading towards WashingtonUnknown Aircraft heading at speed to Washington DCThe above shows that a craft has been seen heading to Washington but is never identified as AA77 by controllers.Only 2 passengers from AA77 are officially confirmed to have made successful phone calls. These were Renee May and Barbara Olsen. FBI Moussaoui Trail - This was the final official account of AA77 Phone Calls and according the the FBI’s sworn evidence, there were only 4 call attempts in total. Only 2 call connected. Only 2 passengers successfully spoke to anyone and there were no cell calls. May and Olsen both had one call that connected and they rung using Airfone. There were 2 additional call attempts, one made by Olsen which didn’t connect and one airfone call by an unknown passenger.However, statements made by Ted Olsen & his secretary and Ron & Nancy May show that this wasn’t the case. These are 2 statements by Ron and Nancy May showing a few contradictory things. Including there was no mention in their first statmeent, and anywhere in the official record that Renee had rung her fiance. The fact that Renee’s fiancee claims he knew she had called from the missed caller ID.As you can see from the statements below that Barbara made many more calls to her husband than the final version states. She also spoke to him more than once and spoke to a number of people including his secretary & left a voicemail on his old office’s voicemail?? It seems strange that she would ring and leave messages on his old office number & ring him where he currently works.Olson & Keyton StatementsOlson 302 - Informing FBI he had new messages on his voice mail at his old law firm.Olson 302 - confirming Barbara’s car had been recovered from Dulles and that he had a possible lead for the FBI. What this was is never mentioned in any other paperwork.Interestingly,At the beginning of this article you will remember me telling you that of all the passengers that were supposed to have boarded AA77, only 22 have been confirmed to have been at Dulles at some point in the morning of 9/11. May and Olson were NOT one of those passengers, and with no CCTV footage, paper trail or witnesses, there is nothing putting May on AA77, with Olson’s car being found at Dulles being the only thing suggesting may have been at Dulles Airport.There is very little information available about the boarding, passengers, witness statements and again, like with United 93, there are many contradictions all the way through this section.Why is there no official paperwork for AA77, like the Captain’s Envelope, boarding passes, tickets, CCTV, ACARS or Airport Employees who witnesses anyone boarding AA77. There are no definite passenger list and no staff rota confirming who was actually working that day. Where has all the official documentation go? Has it been collected by the FBI? Well there has never been a list made public of the evidence that was collected at Dulles Airport. Either all the paperwork and evidence was obtained but remains classified, or there is no paperwork as no one ever boarded the flight.There has been numerous attempts by researchers and investigative journalists to get these documetns or at lease some documents released using the Freedom of Information Act, however, none of the FOIA requests have ever been successful, with people being told either the documents are witheld under National Security Exemptions or the records are sealed. Why would all this simple basic paperwork or CCTV be a national security issue or be sealed even now.When you look at that along with the fact that no family members or friends turned up to collect them from the airport or rushing to check that their loved ones had landed safely after hearing of possible hijackings, this also suggests no one boarded the flightLeave a commentShare. See the news clip below.AA77 has no confirmation that it even took off from Dulles.It was listed as missing for hours after the Pentagon explosion.FAA logs show AA77 airborne over Kansas long after 9.37am.Only 22 people have been confirmed present at DullesNo documentation proves that AA77 boarded passengers or pushed back from its gate.AA77’s silence speaks for itself - the official story cannot be the real story.If you made it to here, thank you very much for reading my article, hope you found it interesting. Part 2 will be posted tomorrow so don’t miss it.Don’t forget that you can also follow me on Tiktok - immysticbazaarLeave a commentShare

🔐 Cryptographic Verification

Archived URL: https://mysticbazaar.substack.com/p/aa77-before-impact-the-flight-and

�� CONTENT HASHES:
  SHA-256:  f159220693467726c16ab9999591b07d3b643cb3b8ced334b0e4b41989141807
  BLAKE2b:  ed9e61002a543772c41b82fd533fd2d87e41353f0ee1cb8a551cb516a0529100
  MD5:      f71729408fa1862cf51ead86ca7b86e5

�� TITLE HASHES:
  SHA-256:  6d6c5be3595d991877a1eda689353784ced3d67d66aeb6b82603f8d0593a4d2d
  BLAKE2b:  3d481670cab2aa425d6fbb8aaf5c81311f64ce4bb1dfc66ae19741a7753c598c
  MD5:      856c43d076468c1e2082323fb40bee46

�� INTEGRITY HASHES:
  SHA-256:  3b06c337639e808aba52821cae26483e9148f44ef6822664d460036f9910a9d7
  BLAKE2b:  543987a5f1e6ffcae0e0232b8a681073cb239d158d27f5cc658362aa763976f0
  MD5:      a240971c1339e3cb861a454b2add69fb

Archived with ArcHive - Client-side cryptographic archival system