The road automatically scans your car and pays for itself in crypto for the extent of your driving. Different areas of Roads made be run by different blockchain concerns everything recorded on the blockchain and transparent governed by a self acting contract.
So going for a drive we might transverse several self-governing entities each one handing off in exchange for crypto and the extent of the drive. Perhaps eventually the separate concerns would merge together this then forms a proclivity or the proclivity to centralize areas of decentralized activity.
It is safe to say that ultimately decentralization as Grassroots organization based on agreements between individuals is the most natural and organic way to go. Is it better to remain as decentralized as possible with the smallest number of connections between people the most intimate ones this is the most decentralized way. Organizations of large groups tend to centralize and we must emulate a data structure that by its nature remains decentralized perhaps that seeks decentralization.
There should only be payment for usage compulsory payment as taxation is theft and involuntary particularly when there's been no agreement between individuals. What service does government offer do I want to purchase that for usage do they accept crypto?
Did I talk about local taxation there are the electric bikes whould I like to rent one? $30 an hour and right there you can get your groceries and pedal on down the sidewalk will the sidewalks going to scan you and when it does it will charge you in crypto for its usage and everything will be like that on the Internet of Things so there's no sense in centralizing for the good of all when it works people opt-in and want the service and are using the service.
Our system could be greatly refined with voluntary opt-in.
