Users:
The posts on my account (which I'll link to below) were a front to cover up some of the actions of exploitative users. Below, you'll see why I did it, and why I want to ask today.
Hello, I would like to ask something, three years later, emphasizing that my intention has never been negative. Still, I believe it’s relevant to clarify certain doubts that have arisen.
| Format 1 | Format 2 |
|---|---|
 |  |
Hivewatchers earn almost $100 a day, but they don't defend Hive's "interests," which would be:
- Quality content
- Anti plagiarism
- Copy & Paste
- Photography/Art/Image Plagiarism (When there is an interface that you can generate within peakd images with AI)
@hivewatchers/the-hivewatchers-and-spaminator-operational-proposal-for-the-period-2024-2026:
I'll try uploading this same content myself, without knowing anyone on Hive, and you'll see the result:
I want to show that it wasn't the content that mattered, but who uploaded it, since for that reason, I should have also deserved that "creator reward" although I admit and it's not difficult to decipher, I used the same post from the mentioned user and modified it, saying the same thing in a different way... so I want to ask those responsible for some things that happen here at Hive
| 1 me: @iquestionla/my-journey-through-wins-losses | 2 me: @iquestionla/the-evolution-of-gaming-and |
|---|---|
| -@bhattg/game-on-the-go-how | -@bhattg/why-splinterlands-stands-out-in |
Other parallel publications:
I'm posting for testing purposes. Is quality assessed? Is the merit one places on the publication taken into account? Is who publishes and who
they know taken into account?:
| Format 1: @bhattg/do-children-inherit-their-parents | Format 2: @bhattg/7-years-on-hive-my |
|---|---|
 |  |
Well, he uses his means to get a large number of votes with publications that the same HW accuse the others of. Evidence:
- 1
- 2
- 3
Both Hive user and witness 
1
2
So the 
@pravesh0/capturing-beauty-in-a-machine:  |
|---|
 |
 |
They don't just repeat a paragraph-image-3/4 paragraph format and nothing but contentless information, they're synonymous with lengthening the publication.
- 2 Now:
And in the same votes, the witness is found
@inuke/smas-are-a-lot-harder-than-i-thought-g3b | A similar format, although somewhat longer and with more content, also contains the vote of the user Bala |
|---|---|
1)@inuke/pointless-blog-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again
2)@inuke/pointless-blog-a-million-dollar-charity
3)@inuke/pointless-blog-zombie-apocalypse
Here it seems that they started creating images with AI. I'm not here to judge, but to ask: do these kinds of non-meritocratic posts deserve those positive votes?
4)@inuke/online-shopping-madness-short-story-final-chapter
5)@inuke/online-shopping-madness-short-story-chapter-2
6)@inuke/online-shopping-madness-short-story-chapter-1
@steemflow/lingering-in-the-depths-of-my-mind-like-a-ghost:
@steemflow/yoy-vs-qoq-which-shows-real-growth-5hd:
The investment on stocks requires a comprehensive study of a company financial report over the different period. Studying the financial metric helps an investor to analyse the growth and performance pattern of the company. Which ultimately helps them in deciding their investment pattern. There are usually two common forms of metric comparison. "Year on Year" and "Quarter on Quarter". However, still many investors remains in confusion over its usage as growth numbers can be very misleading. I am analyzing a little into this comparison module.
The past is a fragment of the post, as I said, synonyms, going around a topic to lengthen and lengthen, without the content itself.
Here I will start talking about meritocracy: I see in this user
A series of repetitions of its content, I counted more than 60 publications in those two and a half months approximately with similar content, without "content" only +30 / +25 images and little text, and although the community to which it uploads its content is about photography, isn't this format repetitive and "doesn't offer anything new to the network"?
Evidence:
@bong1011/getting-back-2au
@bong1011/infested-inside-fourth-part-2a8
@bong1011/infested-inside-third-part-g1f
@bong1011/an-unexpected-reunion
@bong1011/infested-inside-second-part
This takes me to the user: rashed.ifte who also deserves the vote of the user and witness of the network (Bala)
This may not be comparative or explanatory at all, I just came to ask.
I propose that the page of: https://hivewatchers.io/ It should be open source, and it should be possible to see what abuse complaints are made, because from what I see, there are people who can shout, and others who can't even speak, what do you think about this 
09/24/2025
Daily posts about one or two Bitcoin charts
@chorock/bitcoin-price-is-trying-to-stay-above-the-middle-line-of-bollinger-bands-2dy
@chorock/bitcoin-price-is-below-100day-moving-average-again-2fj
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|
 |  |  |
Meanwhile he votes for himself by acquiring 0.5 Hive, + 
Amount of rewards I'm reviewing this week, I'll come back next week to show the content and its respective reward, I'll write it down (come back 10/01)
Year 2024
Year 2023
Year 2022
We can allow ourselves to wonder why this is allowed, given that K.E. is so good in the profile, but this doesn't leave room for "quality" content? Does this allow this depending on what or what the option to do is remove or not? With recycled content so long ago
@chorock/bitcoin-price-broke-down-mini-uptrend-line-after-solar-eclipse-ck8
It seems that the downvote had an effect on one of the two I reported, because nothing happened with the first one?
And also... after 3 years of posting this kind of repetitive content about the price of Bitcoin, will they impose any penalties for profiting from said spam?
As a request and suggestion, it would be good if the complaints were not anonymous and did not remain only in the power of your website, (if it is my ignorance that you share them, I apologize) but if not, it would be good if you showed everything so that the community and users themselves could draw their own conclusions with the data that is not given and that is hidden from them.
This is not worth what they earn with the work they do, it is unjustified.
@chorock/bitcoin-price-is-goint-to-touch-200day-moving-average-dbf
What does the community think?
Returning to the user
In a post I made as proof that their content is pointless, other than to reword and bounce ideas off each other to reward each other among their friends, I congratulate HW for their swift action, which quickly... I don't know how or who, found my content. Perhaps the person who also reported has direct access to HW? That would be a good question.
The reputation of my account is not important (they already lowered it) and with good reason, my content was spam on purpose, to show how fast HW moves when it is not about friends within hive, because the user:
Thanks to this exchange, which lowered my reputation, you proved part of my point. I hope to get the pertinent responses to your moves. Thanks for reading.
After HW gave a warning, the user continued with his behavior, what do users do by being in favor of HW?
@chorock/sps-price-is-ready-to-break-great-downtrend-line-gho
The next defendants will soon be released.
Those who want to collaborate, already know how to do it Discord: iquestionla