Fourteen minutes into the video and it's clear that you have understood basically nothing, whether about the arguments I've been making, or arguments from authority, or about biblical textual criticism.
You don't even know enough to engage. If you find that too rude a statement, I suggest you grow up and do some serious study, but of course I can't force you to do so. If you're satisfied with Dawkins' rubbish and with saying "but a university professor said something about the Gospel of Mark this one time!", nothing I can say will persuade you, and your avoidance of most of my challenges is as telling as it needs to be, your bizarre denials of avoidance notwithstanding.

I'll be disengaging unless and until you actually say something new or interact substantively with any of my arguments.