I get solipsism and respect the foundations of it, but when we talk about an entity that is responsible for creating the "possible" material world and our ability to "interpret" it then there is no place for interpretations, if you need solipsism to defend the existence of God, I interpret it as a rhetorical surrender. Can you see why?

======> Everything is an interpretation until we have the adequate epistemology to say otherwise. There is no place for certainty - I don't see this as rhetorical surrender - rather as keeping an open mind and understanding the limitations, not only of ourselves - but the information we are drip fed by powerful institutions.

Again, we are talking about God, the afterlife and meaning and duties of this life, there is no place in my opinion for any such nonchalance. If we talked about colors for example, than it would be fair to conclude that red is mostly red but not always, not for everyone. But regarding God, I'd put solipsism and the beauty of a diverse spectrum of subjective opinions - aside, away.

=======> You are welcome to do that but essentially, I do not have to accept it. As above, even from the point of interpretation, the epistemological data is not available for certainty. This works for or against any argument you or I may have.

=======>Please if you may - define this concept. I understand it as the whole effect and existance of a concept, whatever concept that is, in a single, some person's mind. Is that it?

You have this correct as far as my point of view - I don't believe otherwise but am happy to be convinced - however how can you convince me unless you have the ability to see things in a higher resolution than your eyes?

I'm pretty sure that polytheism is the belief in many gods, as opposed to monotheism - the belief in a singular. I've never heard of a term for holding many theories about God. Although I have heard that the ability to consciously hold contradictory beliefs is a merit of geniuses.

========> I am no genius - but I have many questions unanswered and concrete proof that powerful institutions and organisations rule the world, and concrete proof that they lie regularly.