What seems questionable? It seems like the wording is pretty solid to me. The obligations of everyone is well-defined. I can't think of a way that either could get out of their obligations while fufilling the contract. That is, except for the
or its equivalent in another crypto
line. IMO that could be a little problematic for if
tries:
- Create a Steem Engine token, call it
SCAMNEOXIAN - Issue themselves 1000
SCAMNEOXIAN - Place a buy order for 1
SCAMNEOXIANat 1 STEEM, makingSCAMNEOXIAN"worth" 1 STEEM - Issuing 1000
SCAMNEOXIANtoand saying that it's "worth" 1000 STEEM
(of course I don't think will do that)
So while there is some wording that can be used to scam , this is only a problem for
, and I can't see anything questionable that could be used against the loaner by
.
RE: The Firefly Bank of Neoxian: daily contracts: 2019-08-13