Tukar ke IndonesiaBetween Rasminah, Piring, and Verdict MA VIVAnews - The news is like a lightning bolt for Rasminah Binti Rawan: The Supreme Court (MA) says he was guilty of stealing six plates and other belongings of his former employer. The MA verdict at once canceled the free verdict issued by the Tangerang District Court judge on December 22, 2010. The 55-year-old woman is now overwhelmed with grief. "This news the family received a week ago from legal counsel. Mother's condition is sad, hard to eat and sleep, "Astuti, a child of Rasmiah told VIVAnews.com, Tuesday, January 31, 2012. The shadow of living in the cell haunts Rasminah. "Mother is traumatized if you have to go to jail again. I hope there is justice and can be free from legal punishment, "said Astuti. To combat this ruling, the family and lawyers plan to propose a last resort, Review (PK). In addition to hurting the sense of justice, there is a strong reason, Rasminah not strong living in the cell. "We will propose the PK," Astuti said. Rasminah's actual cassation was terminated since May 2011 and then, but reportedly only spread a few days. The judges consisting of three people, Artidjo Alkostar, Imam Harjadi, and Zaharuddin Utama menvonis, Rasminah guilty of stealing kitchen spices and property of his employer. "Granting the appeal request from the Public Prosecutor to the Tangerang State Attorney and declaring the defendant Rasmiah alias Rasminah proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act of theft," said Chief Justice Judge Kasasi, Artidjo Alkostar, as quoted from page Supreme Court, Monday 30 January 2012 The Supreme Court also rewarded Rasminah with imprisonment of 4 months and 10 days. And establish the period of detention that the defendant has been subjected to minus all of the criminal sanctions imposed. In addition, the Supreme Court ordered that the evidence be in the form of a plastic bag of oxtail meat, 1 cup, 1 bottle of hair tonic and shampo, 1 sheet of muslim clothes, handkerchief, 1 bottle of mouthwash, 1 can of mosquito poison, 1 tissue box, 1 plate ceramics, 1 Geshen dish, 2 Royal brand plates, 1 Taichi brand plate, and 3 small plates returned to the defendant's employer. However, this decision was not unanimous. The Chief Justice, Artidjo Alkostar, said Rasminah's grandmother was innocent of theft against his employer's belongings. According to Artidjo, the reason for the appeal filed by the prosecutor can not be justified, because the Tangerang District Court has applied the law properly, ie the evidence in the court does not all come from Rasminah's employers. In addition, Artidjo also considered no element of taking the property of others. Artidjo rate, prosecutors also can not prove that the verdict of PN Tangerang not purely free. "Based on these considerations, the appeal request from the prosecutor is not acceptable," said Artidjo. But what power, two other judges insisted Rasminah guilty. He lost the voice. The peculiarities of the Rasimah case Not only for the family and lawyers, Rasimah's ruling is also a concern of the Judicial Commission. Superintendent of Supervisory Board of Judges and Investigations of KY Suparman Marzuki said that although there has been no report yet, if the decision becomes controversial, KY may request a copy of the decision of his appeal. Suparman admitted sad and happy with the decision of the cassation. Why excited? Therefore, Supreme Court Justice Artidjo Alkotsar filed a dissenting opinion in the decision. It means Justice Artidjo not only functioning material truth, but also his conscience. "We hope that the judge will be like that, and he will measure all the context of events with his common sense and his conscience so that the decisions that can become a reference for the optimism of sentimental life into the future," said Suparman after the discussion "Early Projections Projection: Challenges and Commission Judicial Year 2012 "at the KY Building, Jakarta, Tuesday, January 31