Popular Bitcoin speaker and Mastering Bitcoin author Andreas Antonopoulos is popular for his speeches on the internet currency Bitcoin. Considering how Bitcoin is said to be a game changing, decentralized internet currency and a new form of money that feels more-democratic, and controlled by the general public.
The question, 'Is Bitcoin a Democracy?' seems to miss the fact that Bitcoin is first and foremost a peer-to-peer digital cash and decentralized system, and everything else later. During his latest speech at Sydney, Australia he was asked this question and in his response Autonopoulos spoke about how Bitcoin does not fall under this category.
As someone from Greece, where democracy was first introduced, he noted that he personally doesn't believe in raw democracy.
Antonopoulos said and I quote:
Democracy was invented under very specific circumstances: 3,000 land owning, slave owning white males got to decide for themselves and the 150,000 slaves, women, and children who they owned as property.
Democracy without restraints, without human rights, without civil rights, without constitutional protections is a brutal system of oppression where once you get that sliver of majority, you can eradicate everybody else. Without the proper restraints, you could give 51% of the population the ability to decide to kill the other 49% for any reason they choose.
Bitcoin Not a Democracy?
Antonopoulos is very clear about his opinion on Bitcoin not being a democracy.
He further added that:
Bitcoin is a system of super-majority consensus where it takes a very large percentage of the deciding groups (the five constituencies of consensus) in order to make change, which makes change very difficult. Bitcoin isn’t a democracy, not even in the mining.
This technology born out of the internet and expressing some of the radically egalitarian, open philosophies of free flowing information, freedom of speech, freedom of association on a transnational basis that transcends not just borders but every aspect of identity without identity.
According to Antonopoulos’s view on the subject of democracy and Bitcoin he said that traditional systems have a hard time scaling due to their cumbersome hierarchical nature and Bitcoin is the "radical" new political system.
His sentiments were shared earlier by the Bitcoin panel at the MIT Bitcoin Expo in 2016 here they dismissed Bitcoin as anything democratic.
You can learn more about the upcoming SegWit2x Proposal here. The upcoming deployment of SegWit2x and Bitcoin's hardfork has raised many doubts about it's future. There's a lot of noise about this but Antonopoulos thinks it won't alter Bitcoin's consensus rules. I really hope that the network decides the right course of action for itself as we get closer to August 1 and things get better from there.
You must also read this article that explains Segwit2x Hard Fork and Bitmain’s UAHF.
This raises a few questions:
- What do you think about Antonopoulos’s opinion on Bitcoin.
- Do you think this hardfork is essential to Bitcoin's scaling and what about Bitcoin core team?
- Are you worried about a massive crash in it's price or a major rally?
- Can Bitcoin truly adapt to it's highly dynamic environment?
You may also continue reading my recent posts which might interest you:
- Let's Talk—A Realistic Take On What Can Money Do For You and Me!
- Thank You Steemians! I've Crossed the 3000 Followers Milestone! Top Author from India and a Quick Recap!
- Dummies Guide to Basic Steemit Account Security + Account Recovery Guide! Must Read For Steemit Users!
Follow Me: 