I appreciate the work that goes into making these charts. But good technical trading would also establish how frequently these patterns worked for the asset in the past. Have you had a chance to do that? Even a glance at the data immediately preceding your identified "Bullish Bat" sure look like they would have been gored, and repeatedly. The more volatile the asset, the harder it is to have any reliable pattern.

Why draw a hypotenuse from point X to A on the first chart and not draw it to the June 5/6 high? The human mind has a tendency to find false patterns in nature, and this compendium of patterns seems non-falsifiable.

If I say I see the "Engorged Pelican" formation (belly from May 25 to June 5, beak 5 to 12, and fish dangling from its mouth just after that), how would that be proved or disproved anymore than the "Bullish Bat"?