Follow Mayer tweeted that he trusts Bitcoin is at present underestimated, and that his objective cost for this coming February (just four months away) is $27,395 per Bitcoin. He constructs this expectation with respect to the enduring increment of Bitcoin's 200 day moving normal. Mayer is extrapolating the ascent of the 200 day moving normal, expecting it will reach $5,767 by February. If so, he affirms that a for every coin estimation of 4.75 times the moving normal, or $27,395, would be a "reasonable" cost.
Who is he?
Follow Mayer, J.D., was one of the "primary well known bloggers to freely suggest Blockchain innovation" as per his site. At the time, Mayer prescribed that his adherents buy Bitcoin, the cost per coin was simply $0.25.
Like most Bitcoin early adopters, Mayer is to a great degree well off, having as of late tested Roger Ver to a 25,000 BTC bet. There are not very many individuals on the planet with enough squeeze to make $121 mln wagers. Notwithstanding his initial selection and proposal of Bitcoin, Mayer gave seed cash to Kraken, BitPay, and Armory.
On his site, Mayer depicts himself as:
"A business visionary, financial specialist, columnist, money related researcher and impassioned protector of the right to speak freely. Follow Mayer holds degrees in bookkeeping and law. He considered Austrian financial aspects concentrating on Murray Rothbard and Ludwig von Mises."
Mayer has for some time been worried about security and direction, expecting that IRS activity and AML/KYC laws could hamper development and boost awful conduct.
Moving midpoints
Specialized investigation is the specialty of endeavoring to decide the future value development of a benefit in view of its history. While many contemptuously assert that it's just a pseudoscience, others trust that specialized examination has its underlying foundations in human brain science. Investigators are get to call attention to that their work depends on likelihood, consequently it's conceivable to state that the cost will probably go up or down, however the eccentrics of the business sectors shields it from being a sureness.
As per Investopedia, a moving normal is:
"A straightforward specialized investigation device that smooths out value information by making a continually refreshed normal price...A moving normal can help chop down the measure of 'clamor' on a cost chart...or go about as help or protection."
The 200 day moving normal that Mayer refers to is just the normal cost of Bitcoin in the course of the most recent 200 days. Consistently, the most established day's information is expelled, the latest day's end cost is included, and the metric is recalculated. Since the 200 day moving normal is weighted with such old value information, in a positively trending market it falls altogether behind the present cost. The measure's motivation is to demonstrate the general pattern of value development.
For Bitcoin's situation, the 200 day moving normal keeps on rising, demonstrating that we stay in a positively trending market (force is in favor of the bulls). Should the moving normal vacillate, that would be an indication of shortcoming and conceivable inversion. The present cost ought to stay inside a specific scope of the moving normal. On the off chance that the cost goes too far above it, the additions are likely unsustainable.
Mayer is anticipating that the 200 day moving normal will proceed to rise, and that Bitcoin will remain a sensible level over the measure. The truth will surface eventually if Mayer is correct or wrong, yet history surely is by all accounts on his side. All things considered, I wouldn't have any desire to wager against a person who has made at any rate $120 mln off Bitcoin's development.