Why aren't we assuming that this correction isn't a big ABCDE, and that the 5900 dip in feb was C and the subsequent impulse was D, and now we are working on E which should be lower than C.....wouldn't that make more sense? Shouldn't a lower low be primary? I could especially see a lower low given the big hands trying to manipulate price and buy in low. I trust that knows wayyy more about this than i do. Just curious if anyone sees what I'm seeing...and why i'm wrong.
RE: Bitcoin (BTC) Evening Update: Primary & Alternate Counts