I did actually read it, and the violation is in terms of being an unregistered security traded in the state of Texas, with significant questions about the amount of security provided for underlying investments – and that, my friend, is the very definition of a Ponzi scheme.

But you don't have to take my word for it, and you don't even have to take the Motley Fool's word for it, how about an analysis from a fairly well-known cryptocurrency site, Coin Central?

I would be perfectly happy to accept an actual challenge to my belief about the platform. That would be awesome. An exchange of argumentation, clear positions staked out, references to actual fact… I love that stuff.

But first you're going to have to deal with this:

https://coincentral.com/bitconnect-legit-ponzi-scheme/

Now, you will note that I didn't bother to put a down vote on your article because I think that would be counterproductive. I want you to actually defend your investment and your platform. I want you to have the opportunity to talk about how it works, how it makes sense, how it is a sustainable organism. I want you to convince me.

But first you actually have to convince me. You have to make the effort. And you have to make the argument.

Consider this an opportunity for you to do so rather than a reason for you to get pissed off and flap your arms angrily.

I mean it, I really want to hear the BitConnect side of the discussion.

Over to you.