Yet another piece of evidence that shows Andresen's poor character / integrity. I found the PDF you used above and confirmed it did NOT give credit to BitShares, Cryptonomex or Daniel Larimer. It is a clear case of Andresen trying to hijack the Graphene name and take advantage of it without even mentioning BitShares Graphene technology. Cryptonomex didn't trade mark or otherwise protect the name from such despicable attempts to hijack that name for use within blockchain projects, so nothing illegal was done here to the best of my knowledge.

Although the word 'graphene' wasn't invented for use in computer science or blockchain projects, it was not used to claim another's work in any way, unlike Andresen. Larimer's use of the word Graphene to describe his blockchain design was a first in the digital currency space. The "violation" if you can call it that is the total lack of credit Andresen provides to Larimer, and the obvious hijacking of the term in an effort to rewrite history.

However, to claim Graphene as the title for his work without regard to its' use in BitShares reflects very badly on him and the College of Information and Computer Sciences, UMass Amherst IMO that didn't even do the most basic research that would show this conflict.