Regarding the debate between Voluntaryists, as to whether or not there should be open borders, it seems most morally logical to advocate for open borders, under the current statist paradigm. Almost everyone in the world has been victimized or aggressed upon by the USA. Therefore, all "public" property is actually property stolen from the entire human world population.
Since it is impossible to determine how many shares each person owns; an open borders stance is more moral logic. Think about the USA government's meddling in every country in the world. Look into General Smedley Buttlers' admission of guilt at helping to conquer South America for the corporatists. Look into the book "Confessions of an Economic Hitman". There are countless examples of the federal governments aggression committed in probably every country in the world.
All government property has been stolen from the people and should be be considered as unowned property.
My conclusions are based on the recent debate between Larken Rose and Chase Rachels:
Please let me know your thoughts in the comments section!
All the best,
Wes