Here is a simple question. If you get to vote on things yet what is voted for does not happen or is challenged then is that a Democracy? I have my own problems with the idea of Democracy, but I have a bigger problem with Hypocrits and Double Standards.
Brexit. I saw a man giving a good speech saying the vote was to "Leave" or "Remain". It was not a vote about Soft exit, or people stalling and saying now they won't even do it. I guess that vote didn't mean anything.
Yet if they can get the vote they want these same people will Crow and talk about how great it is. Brexit occurred before Trump, yet Trump is another example.
Obama: Trump's Rigged Election Comments are 'Ridiculous' - 53 seconds - An Obama Appeal To The Stone Fallacy
Trump won't commit to accepting election results - 2 minutes and 9 seconds
Hillary and Obama both saying that Trump should not contest the vote because it is not rigged. They were saying this days before he won. You see he wasn't supposed to win. They talked about how his supporters would be violent if he won and would not agree with the results.
This is called projection. This describes completely what Hillary/Obama supporters did. They've spent more than a year of disruptions, tantrums, wasteful spending, and purposeful attacks on society to counter the election of Trump.
I didn't vote for Trump. I probably would now. A lot of that is simply due to what he has actually done (I don't like it all) under an unprecedented onslaught. Also largely I've been swayed by the actions of these mentally immature people that happen to have adult bodies.
I am also very angry at Google/Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, and others that believe it is okay to Censor pro-Trump people for pretty petty things, yet they won't censor people threatening or endorsing violence against Trump or Pro-Trump people. You don't even have to be pro-Trump. You just have to be against what they are trying to force feed us.
Another interesting point just to address the "She won the popular vote!!!". Let's assume she did. So what? Obama and Hillary knew the system, and endorsed it. Popular vote does not matter. We do not live in the United States of California, Texas, Florida, and New York. If popular vote was the way we did things then no candidate would ever need to campaign anywhere but those four states. Yet the other 46 states might as well not vote at all they simply would be the slave colonies to those four states. Thus, we have the electoral college with the intent of making this not the case.
TRUMP & BREXIT: GAME OVER? - 5 Minutes and 40 seconds
Those four states still have more electoral college vote value than the rest of the country, but they are not able to enslave the rest of the country due to their concentration centers for population.
Now let's take some brutal truth. It is highly unlikely Hillary Clinton actually did win the popular vote. They did audit the vote in some states and the cases of voter fraud that were found were to Hillary's benefit. Some of the places that should be investigated they refused to do so. These also happen to be places that will often end up as sanctuary cities, or states. You'll even be able to find examples where they believe ILLEGAL immigrants should be allowed to vote. There are also examples where they can vote.
Fallacies Assignment: Appeal to Emotion (Family Guy) - 37 Seconds
SO if I trespass into your house. I get to vote on what the rules are for your house then? I can walk in and sit on your couch. You better make sure to keep your refrigerator stocked. I need food. In fact, I might have more right to that food than your own children. I'm going to bring my kids with me too. When my children are not sitting on the couch in the house I trespassed on they people that own that house better be paying for my children to go to school. Don't bring up that they can't pay for their children. That doesn't matter. They should pay for me the trespassers children. Why? Because, I will gladly vote multiple times for any politician that protects my right to trespass, get fed, and get my children education. The actual citizens and home owners are not as much of a guarantee of a vote.
Fallacy Examples - 3 Minutes and 41 Seconds
Now this scenario may seem ridiculous. Yet it is happening all across our nation. In fact the great uproar over DACA is about something that isn't even a LAW. It was an executive order signed by Obama. IT was not signed or written by Congress. IT is not a LAW.
So what does it do? It protects the "innocent poor" children of illegal immigrants (aka trespassers) and insure not only are they fed, but they are given FREE education. The interesting thing is that actual citizens cannot get free education for their children, but we are supposed to give trespassers children free education.
The political assholes will attempt to play upon your emotions by painting the children of the trespassers as the victim. How dare you take away their free education? They of course won't bother to point out the children of actual citizens that can't go to school because they can't afford it. Yet, they'll be outraged about anything done against trespassers.
They'll even play with the words and twist them as they attempt to manipulate the citizens. They'll attack anyone talking about this as anti-immigration. Yet there is a big difference between immigration and trespassing. One case they are invited. The other case they are not.
Do you like to be able to decide who can come into your house? If so that is akin to immigration.
Do you like to be able to tell people to leave your house and to kick out people or even attack them if they just open your door, break a window, or otherwise come into your house without your permission? This is trespass.
Most people are not anti-immigration. They are anti-trespassers. For this reason I propose we stop calling them illegal immigration as the asshole politicians trying to mind control the masses will conveniently ignore the word ILLEGAL. They will use that to paint any opponent anti-immigration when they are not. So let's just call it the one word definitions for it. They are Trespassers.
I'm pro-immigration. I am anti-trespasser.
Milton Friedman - The Free Lunch Myth - 7 Minutes and 7 Seconds
I also am anti-FREE stuff for anyone, including citizens. The government has no ability to give anything for free. They have no products other than waste, war, and laws. So anything FREE is actually paid for in one of two ways. 1) Increasing taxes on citizens to spend it. 2) Taking out a loan and essentially taking out a credit card in the name of the citizens without letting the citizens spend it. So FREE in one way or another is stealing from or indenturing the citizens.
Yet in the case of the trespassers it is worse. They want to give FREE stuff to criminals. FREE stuff that non-criminals cannot even get. When someone complains about that they'll play with the words and say emotionally charged but totally false things to try to make people pointing out the injustice out to be the bad guys.
There are examples of Democracy being pushed when convenient and ignored when it is not. There are double standards all over the place. Let's talk about Trump drinking water in a speech as though that is the most important news of the day, or fake that he did stupid things feeding Koi by careful camera angles. Meanwhile let's ignore other people that have committed so many crimes, and in some cases treason yet they are not only allowed to walk, they are given a voice as though they are great people.
The world has been rapidly inverting for awhile. I sometimes call it backwards world.
If you report a crime. The criminal is protected, and you are the villain for reporting it.
If you are a threat to the criminals calling the shot then they'll do everything to blame you for the things they actually do. They'll paint people as criminals, and often get away with that with ZERO evidence. It is also okay for them to waste huge funds, resources and times to dig for petty things against their opponent, yet it is not okay for someone to call them out for actual crimes.
This isn't happening in just the United States and the United Kingdom. This subjective double standard hypocritical "Democracy" is rampant across the world.
Those that complain about capitalism, monopolies, etc are fine with giving true monopolies on a massive scale to entities they support. Those that hate cronyism in capitalism often push for the ultimate forms of cronyism that historically exist and have nothing to do with capitalism.
Things are messy. I can't tell you what is going to happen, as what is occurring seems historically unprecedented on many levels.
I believe we've been essentially seeing World War III actually occurring for some time. The battlefield simply changed to the territory that exists inside each of our minds. Its a war to control our minds, dumb us down, and keep us acting like good herd animals.