Indonesia is a legal state that always puts the law as the foundation in all activities of the state and society. Indonesia's commitment as a state law is always and only stated in writing in article 1 paragraph 3 of the 1945 amendment result. In any case, a State wants its Country to have law enforcement and law that is fair and firm and not selective. There is no sabotage, discrimination and privilege in handling any legal case whether CRIMINAL or PERDATA. As the above term, 'Blunt Down Blunt Top' is the right term to describe the condition of law enforcement in Indonesia. Do we all feel it? Can we see the reality? I am sure all the people of Indonesia also see the reality.
Legal conditions in Indonesia are now more often criticized than praise. Various criticisms are directed both in relation to law enforcement, legal awareness, the quality of law, the uncertainty of various laws relating to legal proceedings and the weakness of the implementation of various regulations. Criticism is so often leveled with regard to law enforcement in Indonesia. Most of our societies will talk that the law in Indonesia can be bought, with titles, names and powers, which have plenty of money to be safe from legal harassment even if the rules of the state are violated. There is public recognition that since law can be purchased law enforcement agencies can not be expected to enforce the law thoroughly and fairly. So far, the law is not only run as a mere routine but is also played around like merchandise. The law that was supposed to be a tool for the renewal of society, had turned into a kind of killing machine because it was driven by a rigged legal device.
The practice of misappropriation in law enforcement processes such as legal mafia in the judiciary, discriminatory judiciary or judicial process engineering is a reality that is easy to find in law enforcement in this country. Ordinary people who are caught doing little theft, such as the underage child of Hamdani's brother who 'stole' flip-flops belonging to the company where he worked in Tangerang, Grandma Minah who took three cocoa beans in Purbalingga, and Kholil and Basari in Kediri who stole two watermelon seeds immediately arrested and punished weighing. While a state official who corrupts billions of dollars of state-owned money can freely roam freely. Unlike the case with the law with suspects and defendants people who have kekusaan, position and name. The legal proceedings are so convoluted and seemingly delayed. It is as if society is always presented by the plays of the characters of that State. No decision is so real. For example, the case of Gayus Tambunan, an employee of the Directorate General of Taxes Group III became an impromptu miliyader estimated to be corruption of 28 billion, but only subject to 6 years in prison, the case of Century Bank and the still warm current Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court (MK), Akhil Mochtar arrested in Operation Capture Hand. In the operation, the KPK has confiscated Singapore dollar money worth Rp 3 billion indicating law enforcement in the Indonesian nation in alert condition, almost all cases above the process to date have not reached a clear decision. Yet all these cases are so detrimental to our State and society. When will this end?
Such a bad condition will greatly affect the health and strength of Indonesian democracy. Mentally damaged law enforcement officers who trade the law is tantamount to injuring justice. Destroying justice or unfair acts is of course a hasty act against the will of the people. In certain circumstances, when justice is continuously avoided it is not impossible that the defense and security of the nation is at stake. Injustice will trigger a variety of natural acts of resistance that can manifest into various anarchist actions or counter-productive violence against the nation's development.
In other words, the situation of injustice or failure to bring about justice through the law becomes one of the problem points that must be addressed immediately and the state must already have a blue paper or blue print to realize what the founders of this nation dreamed of. But corrupt menta and corrupt morals and attitudes ignore or disrespect the legal system and legal goals of the Indonesian people who have a good legal order, according to the author, as a picture that law enforcement is the character or identity of the Indonesian nation according to what is contained in the contents of Pancasila and the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution. With the present situation and conditions norms and rules that have grown to selfishness and individualism without thinking of others and this is the value of injustice will increase the action of anarchism, violence that is clearly inconsistent with character a nation full of consensus-based principles for consensus as perceived and implied in the contents of Pancasila.