This is truly nice data and analysis.
If I may add something, as a upvote hungry Steemian, I might be interested in additional analysis such as these...
Taken from your data here:
https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://ipfs.busy.org/ipfs/QmZgVd5q5F9LCCp49qe4WMFQR2RMzazMRUJ2vTE92enFRY
We could get these data...
| dApp | Avg Vote Worth | No of Votes | No of Authors | Votes per Author | Tot Vote Worth per Author |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dlive | 10.46 | 8388 | 1845 | 4.55 | 47.55 |
| dtube | 34.97 | 2163 | 532 | 4.07 | 142.18 |
| dsound | 11.22 | 3379 | 265 | 12.75 | 143.07 |
| steemhunt | 1.47 | 25204 | 1251 | 20.15 | 29.62 |
| Steempress-io | 4.75 | 6922 | 801 | 8.64 | 41.05 |
| Utopian-io | 7.10 | 4556 | 1321 | 3.45 | 24.49 |
| tasteem | 2.44 | 12332 | 1505 | 8.19 | 19.99 |
| busy.pay | 1.13 | 18150 | 1285 | 14.12 | 15.96 |
| fundition | 57.48 | 256 | 101 | 2.53 | 145.69 |
| esteemapp | 1.12 | 12753 | 2883 | 4.42 | 4.95 |
| Steemit-jp | 1.74 | 4486 | 423 | 10.61 | 18.45 |
| sndbox | 2.35 | 2615 | 1138 | 2.30 | 5.40 |
| Mack-bot | -0.04 | 45749 | 660 | 69.32 | -2.77 |
| spaminator | -4.49 | 3342 | 505 | 6.62 | -29.71 |
| steemcleaners | -8.65 | 2203 | 773 | 2.85 | -24.65 |
With the above data we could get several conclusion such as:
- The biggest amount of (down)votes are given by mack-bot, however these are concentrated to several authors only wherein average each author gets 69 (down)votes.
's
is better in distributing votes where each author gets around 4 votes only while distributing it to almost 3,000 authors.
Another data that I may find interesting but do not know how to get it is the comparison of total users per dapp vs the users who are upvoted.
Anyway, again, the data and analysis you've provided are very useful. Thank you for this.
RE: Effectiveness of SMT support by @misterdelegation and Steemit Inc.