You have to understand that:
At a university a teacher not fail anyone, you that one day he failed to all a class, well this class often tried that socialism worked, they said socialism would be more fair and better, with a intermediary riches, and for them nobody nobody would be poor and rich, would have serious equality.
Therefore the professor proposed make a socialist experiment in class and use the marks instead of money, and that all the marks would be granted based on the average class and therefore would be as they say his students ' Fair. ' the same All should note, which theoretically meant that nobody would be failed, and either would have students with most note.
After make the first test, the professor d average and all students received a 7.
Then students that dedicated to study felt outraged, and what is not an effort to study, were very happy due to the result.
Later when implemented the second exam, which is not an effort for the first, neither did for the second, they thought get good note from peers, and those who if an effort in the first, decided that not harder, as a result of this, the average for the second test was 4 points for each student.
Obviously, all were disappointed with the note
To make the third test, the average was 1, for each student.
Then, the ratings did not have high levels, and disagreements began to occur among the students themselves, and the attempt of the culprits intensified, the group became aggressive, and the atmosphere in class was bleak, and laziness and disenchantment were Present, the search for justice among the students was made present, which was the cause of the complaints, while the injustice and the rancor became a common form among this group, a hostile feeling was present.
Finally, no one studied because they did not want to benefit the rest of the room, and therefore all the students ended up failing the matter, all would repeat the semester of this matter.
To his surprise, the professor explained: This socialist experiment was a failure, because when the reward is great, the effort to achieve success individually will be great, but when the government takes away these rewards, taking these achievements of those who They strove and granted them to what they did not, then no one will do their best, so simple, this is where I place for example, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea.
1.-For each person to receive without working, there is always a person who worked and did not receive.
2 is not possible carry the poorer to be prospered, arrebatándole prosperity to the richer.
3 For the Government of something to someone, it must take something away from another person who works for it.
4.- On the contrary of what socialism preaches, it is impossible to multiply the dividing them riches.
5.- When a part of the population has an idea that is not needed to work, then the other side will understand that it is not worth working to support the first part, and that is where the end of a nation begins.
By thus we understand that socialism, not well and not working, only represents a risk for the future. People who think otherwise, well be ignorant, and subsequently change this opinion when the money of les finish.
– Sir Winston Churchill