I certainly applaud some of the intention and hope behind this movement however a lot of the phrasing and ideas in this post are precisely why I remain skeptical on chaincoin.

A lot of the views and predictions for the future seem to be based on blind faith rather than a plan of work, or any analysis. (this opinion is based on what I've seen elsewhere as well not just in this post)
This sentence for example "If we control most of the coins and HODL, price will rise inevitably, demand will be big but supply low.", is assuming there is some intrinsic value/worth in the coin that will automatically attract a huge demand from 'normal' users. At the moment though there are few (if any) real world applications for this coin, and no one seems to be proactive on this front, therefore I think this movement would be much better served by developing and implementing ways people can actually use the coins, rather than endlessly focusing on the current price , 'building walls' on the exchange and repeating "HODL" over and over.

At the moment the only demand seems to be from HODLers and speculators. And ok that's fine for now, but that demand will quickly dry up if real uses for this coin do not emerge.
The price is simply the equilibrium between what people are willing to sell for and what people will buy for. There seems to be a view of many in this group that if they simply hoover up all the coins and don't sell then this limit on supply will mean the price is automatically high. This isn't how supply and demand works, there needs to be more demand (other than theirs) from end users. Otherwise they are just pushing money between themselves and cannibalising their own group without even realising it.

If real world uses do not emerge the demand from HODLers will run out, and if there is no influx of new demand the coins will be worth a fraction of what was paid for them.