You Think You're Chaos

At root, we can't have anarchy, by which we mean, of course, chaos.

It's strange, though, how chaos seems to be the standard of the day.

It's as if something is keeping it there, systematically, so that the world gets worse and worse.

But it's not like we have overt slavery, right?

I mean, look at all the nice things!
Phones, laptops, computers... Luxury!

But something's wrong, isn't it?
Something is screwy with civilization, with society (f- society?).

And it's staring you in the face.
Even with the title.

You think you're chaos.

So, when I say,
"Taxation is theft," you say,

"And how is that?
Healthcare,
Social security,
Schools,
Roads,
The Internet,
And So Forth.
You're welcome for your socialist paradise."

And I ask you,
Is This Sustainable?

Do you think the everyday hell is sustainable?
Do you think animals being raped and murdered for the pleasure of the belief of humans that they need meat for protein... is sustainable?

You know it's not, but you act like if I don't provide something instead of this cancerous pedophilic zit on the consciousness of humanity, that all of society would fall apart.

There's only one way you could think that:
If you think you're chaos.

You're not entirely wrong.
The universe is indeed made of chaos, and you are the universe.
But the universe is also order, or you wouldn't even be able to comprehend this information, nor be able to access it in the first place.

You think you're chaos.
I agree.
I think you're also order, and to ignore that, is to ignore that taxation is theft.
But that's stating a negative, so you'd be hard pressed to see that obvious truth.

So let's put it this way:
Abundance is the result of a society with consistently applied rules.
If you have exceptions to the rules, and the ability to systematically abuse them...
They will be.

This is the case with taxation and the general blindness to the shortcomings of the mass defense of everyone being stolen from to be discussed in regard to which two preselected candidates to win and lose to make it look like something is happening and a voice of some kind is being heard which by the stretch of the imagination of each person imagining their singular number, 1, in being cancelled out with millions of others being represented by the most dehumanizing characteriztic - an undifferentiated number - 1 - collapses millions of slightly different, and totally "opposed" voices of two preselected people in the ritual of the theft of those who showed up to give their consent to have them and everyone else be stolen from, as well as the theft of those not involved in this ritual whatsoever.

What you have when you eliminate the ritual is the following:
--The lack of the former (7.5%+)x(millions of people) amount of money being stolen from going to a combination of approved of and disapproved of places, whether that be roads (yes) or Iraq for war (no).
--An additional amount of money for people to spend on whatever they wish.

Let's focus on this part for a moment, because the worry is that people will spend it on frivolous things, rather than the things they think should be helped more, like roads. The issue with this contention is that it is self-referential to the original problem.

Here's how:
There is only one distintion being made here - whether there is a certain small percentage of money being taken from people regardless of their consent. Whether they will spend it wisely or not, having those funds not go to where they morally dispprove of, such as war, is a net benefit. Literally, even if they literally burn the money open receiving it, it will do more for the future and the economy. If they burn their money, YOUR money becomes more valuable, for instance!

Additionally, wouldn't you rather be talking about solutions with your neighbors that you and they, on an individual or delegated-based-on-YOUR-say basis, instead of having ZERO say in what happens to the money that's stolen from you that millions of people ritualize to keep the theft and ponzi scheme of social security going? Look - a huge market of people who want to make money and don't want to get burned by social security. There's money to be made by doing another form of social security -- insurance! How so? Prevention is PROFITABLE when interactions are on a voluntary basis. If you don't allow that basis to form by your defense of taxation in that scary people and situations are out there, then you're saying that you think YOU are chaos, and that all of humanity is chaos and chaotic, not just a select few.

All but the politicians whose lies you believe every 4 years.
It doesn't matter. Choose one. They're both lying. Just in different ways.

--Greatly reduced crime and criminal dependence on food rationing funds.
When you aren't creating criminals on every whim to create an eventual police state of terror while blaming a terrorist group of your creation that you pretend you have nothing to do with, such as the CIA and ISIS - great opium buddies in Iraq I'd think, you aren't feeding a huge number of criminals, and the release of human potential for the number of people whose lives aren't ruined by having been in jail and can do what they want to do, even if it's just wasting time, creates a huge overall systematic relief, both economically and societally. Families can then heal.
Perhaps, eventually, the whole world.

But not if you think you're chaos.
And none of us are exempt from the effects of the mass belief in that.
Welcome to the horror that is modern-day slavery.