I've jumped this question several times to avoid it, and it reminds me that every time I keep appearing, I have to leave my thoughts. Who do you save first, your child or your partner in a fire explosion?
His answer is quite impressive and a very difficult question. First of all, I don't want anyone to be in this situation. However, events like this occur or the like.
A family consists primarily of father, mother and children. The union of spouses prepares the breeding process that leads to children. Therefore, it may be a little easier to argue that his wife should be rescued first, with the intention that he may appear in the case of later births and if the children are still alive.
What if there's no chance for another spouse to give it to another wife? What if he's already exposed to secondary infertility and hasn't been diagnosed yet?
What will be the natural bond that a spouse develops for a child? What about the investments already made to the child? In addition, considering a number of factors, the child may first claim that you may have another wife that is much easier to look at compared to the chance of having another child with the same spouse, so the child must be rescued first.
In fact, when such events occur, people tend to lose their logical thinking about the preferred decisions they can take when facing a less critical situation. This is because everything happens very quickly in milliseconds, and you may not even have the time to think logically, and you will watch your heart and hormones.
However, I will pass to my first point for the purpose of this argument. A wife comes before a child, we can not make another wife with the child, but I hope we can make another child.
Sponsored ( Powered by dclick )
USE STEEM ON YOUR PHONE WITH THIS APP AND EARN EXTRA UPVOTES.
PARTIKO IS THE MOBILE APP FOR STEEMIT. DOWNLOAD FOR ...