That's the thing. If you want free speech, this includes the right of people to see your intellectual positions as crazy or stupid.

Nope, I think you may have missed the point. I never actually stated my position on ANY of these issues. I stated many positions. I never actually stated which IF ANY of these positions were ones held by myself.

There is a difference between disagreeing with what someone is saying, and restricting them or physically attacking them to prevent them from being able to say it.

Furthermore, my main point through the entire article was the trend to immediately label someone because they disagree. I also was illustrating how the labels are so often totally inappropriate when applied to the person. They are typically a false dichotomy. You either agree with me or you must be racist. You either agree with any comment about Climate Change or you are a Climate Change Denier. When in reality as I stated the climate has always changed and likely WILL continue to change throughout history. Calling someone a Climate Change Denier is likely almost ALWAYS a false label. Manmade Climate Change Denier would likely be true a lot of the time, but that is not what they use.

Another one I left out. People against ILLEGAL Immigration are often called and labeled as Anti-Immigration. They are not. They are just against illegal immigration which can also be called trespass.

So my entire article was about the haste to label people and use false dichotomies. I presented many different view points to show that there are far more than TWO possible choices in most cases. Yet, people use the false dichotomy to try to force people into camps and groups.