Would you say that everything that does not require force a good idea? On the contrary, sometimes good ideas do require force because the powers in control may not want the good idea to manifest.

That becomes a dangerous slippery slope. I contend if it is a good idea it does not require force. I didn't say that meant it would take effect instantaneously because it is a good idea.

However, as soon as you resort to force it is YOU with your perceptions of the world deciding it was a good idea and thus you decide you must apply force to make it happen. What if you were wrong due to your limited knowledge and it was NOT a good idea? Yet you chose to force it into existence.

The problem is even madmen to think their ideas are good ones.

Thus the saying "good ideas do not require force" is more that if they are truly good you likely will not have trouble convincing people to go along with them, and even if it takes time they likely could come to be.

As soon as we resort to FORCE we are deeming us as RIGHT and thus the one who should be able to make the RULES. So begins every dictatorship.

If we take force out of the equation we remove that possibility. Because, whether a lot of people like to admit it or not (not meaning you) each of us is very limited in our knowledge, and we are wrong about a lot of things.

Thus, using force could be a very bad thing backing a WRONG idea simply because we thought it was RIGHT.