"The b. of joy is the project Bernard was advertising in his famous interview."

Um, no? Please give me a time-stamp in that interview where he "was advertising" the B of Joy.

"This is mainly why he did the interview."

Wrong again. He revealed his exact reasons for doing the interview in the third part - but seems like you didn't pay much attention to it.

"This one gets deeper into what we can find out about him and his project b. of joy."

Where exactly is the content about him (Ronald Bernard) here? Quoting from his interview is not exactly "getting deeper" is it? More than half the article deals with Hans van der Liet and what he likes on facebook.

"Hans van der Liet, lawyer working for the b. of joy, is a big supporter oft Israel. Isn’t that odd? I his video interview, Ronald Bernard made some remarkable claims that many people consider anti-Semitic. [...]"

You realize you just provided great evidence that Mr. Bernard can't be the anti-semite certain people accuse him to be? If he was, why would he have someone on his team whose favorite topic is fighting anti-semitism and making no secret about that? Exactly.

Why would someone whose favorite topic is fighting anti-semitism be on the same team with an anti-semite? Exactly.

Is that what you would call shooting yourself in the foot? Great job :D