This is: Your Daily Dose of Wild Speculation.
This event has so many weird coincidences, changed stories, non-stop news coverage, political grandstanding and power grabbing, odd numerology, and new tactics made acceptable, that it fits the description of a False Flag event. This is not an attempt to say any of this is fake or did not happen. The victims are real, it is a massive tragedy for both the original victims, the police that were killed, and all those affected by the riots and upcoming unrest. This is just an attempt to point out the very strange timing, tactics, and effects of this event.
The following articles describe the warning signs of a False Flag Operation, (with links to 5 confirmed ones), a comparison of this event to other False Flags like Gladio, and finally a youtube video with a nice girl calmly explaining how extremely bad this situation is.
Some of the prominently strange details about this event are:
- There was a huge news scandal that is now being ignored.
FBI director refuses to prosecute Hillary http://www.c-span.org/video/?412315-1/fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-hillary-clinton-email-probe - There were Active Shooter drills in the area recently.
http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/active-shooter-drill-took-place-8-days-before-dallas-massacre/165701 - The accomplices that were caught are suddenly dropped from the story. Now it's a single sniper.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcOUUEDtpXM&sns - Suspect is ex-military, took a name similar to Malcolm X, and just happens to be in a semi militant group (BLM)
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/07/09/dallas-sniper-followed-black-militant-groups-on-facebook-was-sent-home-from-afghanistan-over-harassment-claim.html - Suspect is killed so no stories are told. (Police killed him when he was completely surrounded and alone)
http://ktla.com/2016/07/08/dallas-sniper-attack-5-officers-killed-in-deadliest-day-for-law-enforcement-since-911/ - Those in power set new precident, gain more control, new acceptable tactics. Killing Suspects with Robots...
http://www.cnet.com/news/dallas-shooter-killed-by-bomb-equipped-robot-in-first-for-law-enforcement/ - These things always seem to happen on strange dates. 7/7... (just to set the numerologists off)
The Warning Signs of a False Flag Operation:
~There is an immediate comprehensive narrative, including a convenient culprit. Law enforcement, government agencies, and the mainstream media immediately proffer a narrative that completely explains the event and encourages citizens to tie their intellectual understanding of the tragedy to the emotions they experience. In his lecture at Contact in the Desert, Richard Dolan noted that a distinguishing characteristic of a false flag operation is that the official narrative IS NOT questioned by the media. There are often legislative, ideological and sociopolitical power plays waiting in the wings, which the government can immediately implement. The most striking example of this is the Patriot Act, which was written well before 9/11 but seemed to correlate entirely with the events that had transpired.
~The official narrative has obvious domestic and geopolitical advantages for the governing body. The Bush administration used 9/11 to usher in the War on Terror, which has served as a lynchpin for countless civil liberty infringements by the national security state, including ubiquitous domestic surveillance and indefinite detention. It also directly paved the way for an invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq—countries that had nothing to do with the attacks—allowing our government and defense contractors to control the natural gas pipelines and oil fields. This bears a striking resemblance to Operation Ajax.
~The narrative behind the attack serves to leverage emotions like fear, as well as patriotism, in order to manufacture consent around a previously controversial issue. For example, many of the recent domestic terror attacks, including the Aurora shooting, have exacerbated and reinforced advocacy of gun control legislation. More importantly, these attacks divide populations and invite the government and militarized local police forces to have the authority to declare martial law at will, locking down entire neighborhoods. We saw this after the Boston marathon bombing, the most striking example of this nation’s post 9/11 police state mentality.
~Military training drills and police drills occur on the day of and very near the attack itself, causing confusion to obscure eye witness testimony and allowing orchestrators to plant both patsies, disinformation and backup operatives. This is no small point. An incredible percentage of major domestic or international terror attacks have involved simultaneous “training drills.” This list includes, but is not limited to, the infamous NORAD drills of 9/11, the 7/7 London Bombings, the 2011 Norway shooting, the Aurora shooting, Sandy Hook, and the Boston Marathon. Though none of the aforementioned events can be confirmed or denied without a doubt, they bear a striking resemblance to previous false flag attacks and should be looked at with an investigative eye.
The bigger false flags that occurred in the last two decades undoubtedly utilized unimaginable amounts of money and resources. It will take time and many contributions by intrepid researchers and whistleblowers to prove them.
The cases made for and against 9/11 being a false flag “inside job” are voluminous and highly controversial. The narrative is so convoluted with disinformation that despite all of the technology and online resources at our disposal, it is highly unlikely we will know for sure how many layers of shadow and black op agencies were used—if, in fact, they were. What we do know is that shortly before the events of 9/11, then-Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion dollars was missing from the Pentagon’s budget. Unfortunately, too much evidence has been destroyed or manipulated to reach a conclusive verdict as to whether it was a full blown false flag or an extreme case of state opportunism.
Remember, the story of the false flag phenomenon is one that is still being written. Our analysis of it must breach the most powerful information control filters the world has ever seen. As technology and social enlightenment make the crimes of the world’s national governments transparent, we will see shocking new chapters added to this history that will shatter mainstream perceptions of reality.
More here, with examples: http://theantimedia.org/5-confirmed-false-flag-operations/
July 14, 2015 | ANTIMEDIA
DALLAS MAIDAN: Staged Snipers Designed to Inflict 7/7 ‘Strategy of Tension’
July 8, 2016 By 21wire
**Last night, a highly emotive and politicized GLADIO-style event unfolded in America. Still, after so many other similar events recorded throughout recent history – all followed by similarly predictable political fall-outs and effects – the general public are still slow to grasp what is really happening before their eyes.
**
The event in Dallas falls into a similar pattern of other high-profile ‘sniper’ attacks, all of which were stage false flag events designed with a particular political, or geopolitical purpose in mind.
Regarding last night, here’s what we know so far…
The plot: According to law enforcement officials, at least 5 police officers were shot and killed with another 7 wounded, after 3 or 4 alleged snipers described as ‘radical left-wing’ and armed ‘militant black activists’, fired from surrounding buildings into an 800-strong ‘Black Lives Matter’ protest crowd who were marching in downtown Dallas, Texas. Amazingly, we’re told that only one civilian was reportedly injured.
Protesters are said to have been marching against the recent police shootings of two black men in the cities of Baton Rouge, Louisiana and also in St. Paul, Minnesota.
Amazingly, by late last night and early this morning, police Chief David Brown reported that at least 3 of suspected snipers were already in custody.
Brown stated early on that he believed the four suspects were working as a unit, using long-range rifles, “triangulated at elevated positions at difference places in the downtown area.”
The fourth suspect, Micah Xavier Johnson (the media referred to him as ‘Micah X’ to intentionally prompt a Malcolm X tone to the event) a military-trained marksman and US Army veteran was said to be caught in a shoot-out with police from the second floor of the El Centro parking garage.
“He was upset about Black Lives Matter, the recent police shootings, he was upset at white people. He wanted to kill white people, especially police officers,” Brown said. (NY Post)
Bizarrely, according to police, Johnson (photo, above) was finally summarily executed by police after an unprecedented ‘risk assessment’ by the Dallas police – who deployed a “robot carrying a bomb.” Chief Brown claimed that his officers “had no choice” but to use the bomb to kill the suspect: “Other options would have exposed our officers to grave danger.”
The political ripple effects of this unlikely and highly improbable event were felt immediately, as the mainstream media siege was underway, and the politicians began lining up to weigh-in and jockey for political position on any number of issue ranging from gun control, to race relations, and police brutality, but also debating the whether or not public marches and demonstrations are indeed “safe for the public” to attend in the face of this latest “security threat.”
On the police side of this dialectic, law enforcement are also queuing up to decry the violence against police and calls are omnipresent for increased police powers and security measure in order to “combat the rising threat of domestic extremism.”
Coincidentally, yesterday’s event just happened to all on July 7th, or ‘7/7’ ala London 7/7. Following on that theme, the media and law enforcement began floating the term “terrorist attack” and CNN leading the pack by claiming that Dallas 7/7 was the police’s “worst loss since ‘9/11′” (Sept 11, 2001). So one can see how the spin is already being applied to this media event.
The Maidan Massacre
Back February 2014, events transpired in Kiev, Ukraine which sparked international outrage and calls for ‘regime change’ in Kiev, and served as the key catalyst for a coup d’etat and the ouster of Ukraine’s democratically elected president Viktor Yanukovych.
A leaked phone call between EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton and Estonian foreign affairs minister showed how there was knowledge at the highest levels of European government, but western leaders opted to maintain a disinterested stance in the face of this new evidence. Listen to the phone call here:
Since the incident, numerous investigations have been conducted that have documented beyond any reasonable doubt that the Maidan’s infamous ‘sniper massacre’ was a politically engineered event, designed to lay the blame for dead protesters and dead police – onto the government’s Berkut special police force, amplify domestic unrest and accelerate a US and EU supported geopolitical campaign of destablization which was already in motion.
Earlier this year, in January 2016, one such academic investigation concluded that the sniper event at Maidan Square was in fact a ‘false flag’ event which was used to create a false public perception of events and usher in a shift in political power in that country. Canadian political science professor Dr. Ivan Katchanovski of Ottawa University concluded that
“This academic investigation concludes that the massacre was a false flag operation, which was rationally planned and carried out with a goal of the overthrow of the government and seizure of power,” wrote Katchanovski in his study, called ‘The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine.’
Despite all these revelations, the US, UK and the EU are still standing by their earlier narrative of the sniper massacre as a, ‘Euromaidan democratic, peaceful mass-protest movement and a ‘color’ revolution led by pro-Western parties.’
Ukraine’s own internal investigation into the matter has been shown to be a highly political exercise, which appears to have resulted in a comprehensive cover-up of what really happened on the day.
~
The Dallas Deception
The Dallas Shooting is significant on a number of levels.
Firstly, Dallas will further accentuate the artificial divide between what Americans perceive as the ‘Left’ or liberal wing of political society, and the what is sold as America’s ‘Right’ or conservative wing. In this dialectic, Democrat is set against Republican, young against old, black is pitted against white, wealthy against poor, upper class against middle class, and even middle class against lower class. In the run-up to the Presidential election in November, this division will be important in order to polarize America along a prefabricated dialectical line and thus keeping the national discourse down at a base, or emotional level – and through this binary process avoid any real examination of America’s fundamental issues, policy flaws and the federal government’s unsustainable bloated borrow & spend habit – effectively kicking the can down the road another 4 years (which seems to be the norm). Ultimately, this serves the state, its bureaucratic stakeholders and the power structure as a whole.
Secondly, this event can be used to nudge the ‘left-wing’ and Democrat party’s own gun control agenda, which is being aggressively pursued at the moment. This wing of the political establishment has already demonstrated that it has no qualms about using a national incident or tragedy, like the Orlando Shooting, as warm PR leverage to push their ’emergency’ legislative agenda. Ironically, ‘left-wing’ and black activists will be blamed for this latest act of political violence and will be used in this case to further advance the political left’s own bespoke gun control agenda – much to the dismay of ‘Conservative America.’
As a result of this staged event carried out by agent provocateurs, “anti-police” or “anti-government” African-American ‘militant’, or ‘Black Power’ activists will be painted a poor light, and effectively marginalized. Once this process if complete, the state can then move in to extend that marginalization to any ‘anti-government’ protests – further neutering any real grass-roots opposition for what is obviously a rapidly growing police state in the US.
Thirdly, this event is being used to increase tension between the public and law enforcement. Note the differences between the short and the long-term narratives at play here. In the short-term, this Dallas Sniper event is originally designed as a ‘reaction’ to US police killing poor unarmed black men on the streets of America, but in the long-term the pendulum will swing back to the state in order to “restore law and order”, thus further consolidating power into a more concentrated police state. This is evidenced already by US law enforcement are already rallying in solidarity, in an “us against them” dialectic by placing the nation’s police as the protagonist and the public as the antagonist.
This obvious dialectical theme is already being echoed internationally on Twitter, as police in the US and the UK advance the term ‘Thin Blue Line”:
It should be noted here that the colloquial policing term Thin Blue Line is derived from the term”Thin Red Line”, which describes as an inferior, outnumbered force holding back the hordes. The original reference of this comes from a Battle of Balaclava – fought by the Highland Infantry Brigade for the British Army during the 19th century Crimean War. Explained:
“The Thin Red Line has become an English language figure of speech for any thinly spread military unit holding firm against attack. The phrase has also taken on the metaphorical meaning of the barrier which the relatively limited armed forces of a country present to potential attackers.” (Wiki)
It’s important to understand the symbolism behind this term ‘Thin Blue Line’ which is currently being invoked by law enforcement. It implies an “us against them” dialectical narrative, arguably, quite far and remote from the familiar peace officer-oriented slogan “Protect and Serve.**”
**
Finally, this event will be used to reinforce and heighten the ever-increasing profile of America’s bizarre new post-9/11 Cult of the First Responder, which appears to be an extension of the ‘Cult of Our Boys’, a lionization campaign which was developed by the Pentagon over years of mass US troop deployment in two highly unpopular wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The main thrust of the effort to glorify and assert to preeminence of the First Responder is part and parcel of a wider US agenda to fully militarize US domestic society, and to characterize US public life as a combat zone, or domestic war zone which society devolves its authority and constant crisis management over to America’s new unified command structure and G__endarmerie – the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the FBI.
Between the 1960’s and 1990’s, Operation GLADIO saw numerous staged terror events carried out in Europe in order to advance a ‘strategy of tension’. All of the alleged “terrorist” attacks during this time were later proven to be the work not of terrorists, but of the security and intelligence services. Many innocent civilians died, and still to date, no one has been convicted, much less brought before a court or public hearing on a dirty state-sponsored program which many believe is still running to this day, albeit in one form or another.
Expect the political rhetoric to spin out of control with each media cycle over the next 72 hours, before fading into Monday. Such is the nature of the Daily Shooter in these troubled and fleetingly real times.
This girl on the youtube channel TRUTHStreammedia calmly sums it up quite well.
This just turned into a terminator movie. The police now have robots, bombs, and seem to think they can use them against people first. No capture, no trial, no defense, just blow up the suspect.
I am not sure which is worse, to think that this was planned to gain more control, or it just happened and the reaction was unplanned. Scary times to be living in...