Those who have been following along will know they possess more than one clue as to what is incorrect, why the lunar lander Beresheet crash landed one year ago.
Each time we send craft to operate on the moon, a form of interference ca
..any idea the field density that is actually required to cause an EM field induced malfunction?
WHAT!? Z? ..how did you make it to the moon with a redundant third axis? ..I suppose we always did, it still surprises me.
AHA! ..if it were the CMB (cosmic background radiation) of particles in space, this would not keep happening at the approach to the lunar surface.
Seems a quantum field based problem rather than interferent particles. Radio frequency interference SHOULD be a non-issue for lunar landing equipment.
The probability is increasing with consideration of facets.
How to express ..quantum levitation of superconductors that bind magnetic field at a specific field density. The distance from the macroscopic source of quantum field determines the field density ..TRAVELING through the field does not equal stable field on the converged particles of the lander in space.
At the speed the lander was traveling through the lunar macroscopic quantum polar field (3000 km/h), EM field can interact upon particles in circuit components inducing interferent EM waves.
We cannot travel there to check, the postulation seems reasonable.