I do agree that these things should be discussed openly because this is an un precedented situation. We shouldn't accept a given situation whole heartedly without discussion when we do not know how new policies that are created today will be used in the future.

I have been fully vaccinated and living with a vaccine "passport" for at least 6 months and I have no issues with the process thus far. But I do have mixed feelings on it nonetheless because we cannot say with certainty that these policies won't change in the future and be used in new ways that are discriminatory.

It's a challenging situation and I have mixed feelings on it. On the one hand I certainly believe in personal freedoms for the individual, but on the other hand I realize that we are a social species living in a society and do have a certain obligation to the group. The group is more important than the individual, a concept who's importance sort of falls on a spectrum that is dependent on the country that the individual lives in and the socioeconomic and political policies that govern it. Basically, does the individual live in a country with universal healthcare and government support for inability to work because of infection, or not? The situation really needs to be treated differently in these two countries. A country where the cost of healthcare and unemployment are the sole responsibility of the individual can allow more freedom because the burden of consequences fall solely on the individual. On the other hand, in a country with universal healthcare, the burden falls on society, so maintaining the group is more important than the freedom of the individual. It would be "fair" if individuals who choose not to be vaccinated had to give up their rights to free healthcare and government support for missed work for any and all covid related issues. That would be a "fair" system and fall within the "rules" of individual freedom, but it would be impossible to implement, it think.