The anti-vaccine campaigners blur these lines and ask us to assume that the vaccines are poison because of political corruption.
Some may do, but I personally do not. I simply present the data from governmental sources and show an interpretation that is hard to refute (and generally has not been refuted). I, like Dr. Malone and many others are pro science, pro health and pro truth - which ultimately requires being pro integrity. If you accept that large corporations and governments will kill you for profit, then when the data confirms that this is happening due to COVID19 it is surely a situation to pay attention to the data and testimonies that are available.
I am not asking anyone to assume anything, there is no need to. Just look at the data rather than believing the narrative and interpretation fed through MSM and gov.
He was one of many scientists experimenting with injecting DNA and RNA into muscle cells in the '80s, but was not involved with subsequent decades-long research that led to lipids being used safely without excessive inflammation.
This article in Nature covers the story and Malone's involvement. I don't know how much of it he personally would agree with. In essence, he was part of a chain of people involved in discoveries that led to the technology as it is today, that is correct. While it is perhaps not 100% correct to say that he is THE inventor of mRNA technology, he is certainly one of the key people involved in it's 'invention' and deserves to be heard.
this part seems to rely on argument from authority, which is inconsistent with a philosophy that we should question claims from authority figures.
Absolutely, appeal to authority is a logical fallacy, for good reason. When I bring up Dr. Malone it is not to defer to his authority or to suggest anyone else should - it is actually to present an opposing voice against other supposed 'voices of authority' that still others would have us defer to. I personally value my own interpretation of things above most others, but only because of the extent of the research I've done on so many inter-related topics. I think it would be great if everyone trusted themselves above others too - but that is not where the majority are at currently. In order for me to trust myself above others, I have to also always remain open that I might be wrong on absolutely anything and be open to be corrected. The trust in self comes from me knowing the full chain of logic and research that has gone into my own position, whereas I don't know that in other people. I can 'debug' my own reasoning better than I can do with other people.
Do you believe him because he is an authority figure or because his views confirm your bias?
I aim to have no beliefs whatsoever. Beliefs are simply thoughts that say that other thoughts are correct, without really knowing if they are. Beliefs are essential guesswork and misleading at best. I also don't trust alleged authorities over other people, in general. What I do do is keep an open mind and listen to those who have clearly put a lot of time and intelligence behind their understandings and statements. Dr. Malone is one of quite a long list of experts who hold similar positions regarding the COVID19 shots and there are many aspects to the situation that some would agree on and some would not. I highlight him primarily because he seems to me to be a well balanced thinker who I have never seen debunked on an of his claims. Additionally, his connection to the development of mRNA vaccine technology is relevant to me in terms of the relevance of his experience to the subject.
Here is a long interview with him where he covers a long list of relevant points to this whole topic: https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-robert-malone-mrna-vaccine-inventor-on-latest-covid-19-data-booster-shots-and-the-shattered-scientific-consensus_3979206.html
His complaints are trivial such as taking issue with the expeditited approval process or the government’s system for tracking adverse reactions, or saying we don't have enough data to administer shots to children
The majority of people I know would not consider these issues to be trivial. This is where we diverge in a major way. He himself has stated many times that Fauci, for example, is a criminal:
https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1452099768251990017
- RWMaloneMD
He is also desirous of seeing other key figures charged with criminal acts:
https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1451644939469680641
- RWMaloneMD
There are other interviews with him where is more vocal in terms of his suspicions of orchestrated criminality - aka conspiracy.
He is also vocal on the control and censorship of the use of Ivermectin:
For me, the most pressing issue is that of vaccine adverse reactions, which are being covered up and denied. I continually see testimony from people who have probably been permanently injured or relations of people who have apparently died as a result of the shots. This is not insignificant. The calculations I have made show that there is a reasonable chance that the shots will kill more people than COVID19 can. The links to the relevant articles have already been shared to you here. Here is one in particular based on US data:
The risk from COVID19 to children is almost non existent, but the risk to them from the shots is substantial. The idea that it is meaningless that many innocent children would be killed for nothing as a result of using this shots is abhorrent!
RE: Your Comments On The Cancel Culture And Zeroing of Viral Posts on Hive By Curangel.