Thanks! There will be one final part where I go over the economics of the token and the competitors.
I'm not really against having advisors, but I think it's misleading to represent them as team members. IMO, it would be better to list a core team and an advisory board or whatever.
The token distribution is fine as it is, but just irks me because in part 1 and 2 I already got the feeling that the token does not add value to the project. I feel a lot of companies are hopping on the crypto bandwagon in order to get easy money from investors.
RE: 🚩 Etherparty Analysis Part 3: Team & Funding