Yes, I considered clarifying the PIVX inheritance of DASH commits, but I figured I wouldn't clarify the inheritance of previous work for ETH prior to the fork. My thought was, that much work has been put into it, no matter how you look at it. Technically, Bitcoin was forked to create Dash and that's another clarification of inheritance of existing work and so on.

KoreCoin was exposed in another of my posts, essentially it was a pump and dump at the time and the mike mike guy says he's the developer now (including in the comments on the post itself) and they're supposedly not using the old source, but he's actively promoting the old source on bitcointalk and twitter, along with the "new" website. He was also the developer originally, though he denies it. It's still evident in his bitcointalk history however. Also, in the comments of the post are screenshots of the pump group actively attempting to discredit me.
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@ashr/korecoin-s-dirty-little-secret

I help admin a fb crypto group (belonging to www.steemit.com/@cryptoclub ) and the associated beginner's group. I write focused on what the newcomers to the industry are being exposed to through hype and things they should know. I subscribe to the "teach a man to fish" philosophy. I focused on the major symptoms here because that's what our newbies need to help them learn right now (sideeye at "plexcoin", with no whitepaper, laughable github, but a great marketing team).
Cheers :)