- concept is interesting, to say the least. I'm reasonably familiar with the concept of options - you have a first party (buyer) that purchases a contract from a second party (seller) with the right (but not an obligation, like you say) for the buyer to purchase from the seller at a fixed price before a given expiry date. However, what I'm not clear on here is who acts as the second party in your proposition above - is it GenesisVision (because they have negotiated a deal with the ICO - that's my impression?) or is it the ICO themselves? Thanks.
RE: Options: pre-ICO process evolution