Hello, creator of DTube! Thank you for your comments. :)
- In terms of designating influence within the network, we were thinking about leveraging the same principles that Steemit uses, meaning that reputation would be based on your staked account balance (which could either be bought or earned). The general thought is you'll be incentivized to use your influence for good, because if you act maliciously against the interests of the system, I'd imagine the price per token would drop on the market and, because your tokens are vested, you'll be hurting yourself financially. Thoughts on that?
- Check out page 16 of our white paper. We are planning to run custom algorithms on top of the review system to determine a
ReviewScorefor each review, and averaging eachReviewScoreto determine an overall rating for each crypto project. Would love to get your thoughts on this! - With regard to the 80/20 split, what you said makes sense! We chose this split because it seems to be close to what Steemit does, and Steemit has been very successful. Did we get that wrong? Is there a better split you would suggest?
- Glad to hear your thoughts on the ICO debate. Are there specific reasons why you think it would be a better long-term play to not go the ICO route?
RE: Announcing Cheddur 2.0 : An Incentivized Crypto Review Platform using a Steem SMT