Thanks for the reply!

I've never really given it much thought about the platform versus services thing. Now that you mention it I've recall hearing about EOS (currently) running on top of the Ethereum blockchain, if I remember correctly. That's really interesting. Does this mean that when I as a user of such a service have to pay for both the "fuel" using the service, and the "fuel" (i.e. ether) consumed by the Ethereum blockchain?

Back to the original thread topic: I see that you suggest a 70/30 split. Given that all services will need a platform to run, might it be wise to instead go all in on the platforms? It's likely to be quite a few platforms compared to services, so it would be easier to spread my assets on all the different platforms, hopefully cover all of them, than to spread thin over both a number of platforms and a number of services.