I guess that hope was in vain.

You are full of rhetoric as well as you are completely indoctrinated into Marxism.
This makes no sense, Marxism is an analytical framework which says one should argue using the dialectic, or rather Marx's developments thereof. Rhetoric, at least your meaning of rhetoric, isn't a part of it, nor was it ever. As such this entire point, and the rest of this poorly-formed "argument" (in the loosest meaning of the term) is fallacious. Marxism doesn't cause this rhetoric you're talking of, your understanding of which (both rhetoric and Marxism) seems to be entirely lacking.

Also, reminder that argumentum ad hominem aren't arguments and that you literally are unable to refute a single point of me other than repeating cold-war era propaganda-originated rhetoric, which isn't even an argument against Marxism, just an argument against your strawman of one.

Not interested in your demagoguery.