Tell me how I at this point in time should not just translate what you're saying in an effort to abuse curation when you time after time keep saying that we are abusing the rewards pool for our own self interest by voting on things that do NOT benefit us personally in any way but all of Hive itself.

With your logic everyone voting on Hive account@hbd.funder comments is also doing it out of self-interest?

You keep ignoring VOTE BUYING from freecompliments and saying they're "Doing good for hive" so we should allow it.

You keep ignoring that voting on automated non-content as long as it promises to buy random layer 2 token with half of the rewards because it's "good for hive" so we should allow it.

Sorry but you keep time and time again using the same obvious wrong accusations that anyone can provably show you are wrong to attempt to justify misuse of curation for small parts of the ecosystem that only benefit a small portion of hive stakeholders using the Hive reward pool, is starting to sound like you either have some issues in the understanding department or you're just a malicious actor attempting to get your will through at all cost of how curation should be misused at the benefit of a few. It's becoming weird to the point where I don't really know how I can explain it to you in a different way or a different language.

You keep insisting that just because people have bought/earned stake, they should use it however they like and ignore the fact that this ends up hurting authors who don't have stake because as has been proven by some of the projects mentioned above and some still ongoing, it ends up benefiting only those with stake and those perpatrating the scheme that's basically self-voting the delegators with all their stake back rather than looking at other things to curate to retent and grow the users in the ecosystem.