Yes, I have proposed many alternative structural amendments. It is clear that everyone knows that the leveraged advantages are counter-productive. It has been acknowledged at the highest echelons.
Advantage is justifiable - the extent of the advantage is not; nor is the blatant intravoting which ensures that the distribution or decentralisation is meaningless to all intents and purposes. I thoroughly understand the necessity for power weighting. I do also see that one of the reasons for the price of steem and its history is due to the failure of decentralisation.
Again, admitted by the top echelons.
I have proposed these things and there is no power in me to force people to listen. All I would say is that the powers who are usurping the system might be happier with half the power and four times the steem value ... and rising!
I cannot promise that but I do know how to get there.