i wish i could have written this whole post with memes
I was going through the picks today, and was having a lot of fun. So much stuff to choose from, and so many stood out from the title alone. What was inside was even better, exotic and stunning beauty from places you'll probably never go.
Some of the subjects you'd assume to be sleep-inducing and ready to write-off, but the author clearly found something worth sharing, and the effort was so evident it was like they were grabbing your face and positioning just right so you could see it the same way.
I literally remember (probably because it was only a couple of hours ago) just kind of grinning in awe or in playfulness in response to a few. It's what I expected to see, and some had gone impressively far beyond, which I was very grateful for (while I am referring mostly to the heavily creative content, a lot of the posts containing anecdotes or that just read conversationally like honest dialogue were surprisingly enjoyable, as I don't typically care for that.)
Only, now I'm confused.
Before I continue, I want to sincerely apologize in advance to the author. This isn't about singling someone out and making them feel bad--I don't know you at all, so believe me it's not personal, and I'm sure you have other content that's great. But in spite of feeling reluctant and anticipating some awkwardness, there's really no point in being here if I can't have an honest discussion about content. If that's the case then I might as well save time by figuring it out now and cutting my losses.
Alright, after several posts, I came to this one
https://steemit.com/life/@etcmike/life-hack-simple-fast-way-to-open-thin-plastic-trash-bags
Yea, I was just kind of bored and looking to procrastinate. I thought it was going to be some new trick, like the one where you learn to peel an egg by cracking it, and then just rolling it on the table to remove the whole shell at once. Or where you put the egg in a glass of water and keep shaking, yielding similar results . Or the really cool way, where you remove a little bit on from the ends of the egg, in holes about the size of quater, and then hold it up to your mouth, and BLOW to pop the egg out of it's shell. I know, right? Bad-ass eggery. Wait sorry that's a real thing, strike that. Eggishness. That'll have to do. Moving on.
Unique, novel, quirky, clever, bad-ass, epiphanic, life-changing, universe-imploding, yada yada yada, you get the point, that's what we're hoping for (at least in pretense while avoiding that paper...or running down the last ten minutes of work...).
But...it's just something you can buy at the grocery store. In fact, the same grocery store where you can actually see the cashiers and baggers using said product in exactly the manner described. So like me, and what I assume must be a large portion of "everyone", I think it's safe to say that most people can considered as "already in the know"probably for quite a while now,f you've ever bought groceries. Okay scratch insightful and novel off of the list. Hm, okay but surely the--the pictures are...taken with a webcam from the 90s? Err...k...then...uhh...Effort...is a...nope...
Okay, well, that's weird, but I'm sure there's a catch somewhere, so scroll down scroll down scroll down....no....scroll up scroll up scroll up...nada. That's it. Ironically, NOW I AM actually interested. It's gotta be some kind of cipher right? Posted under some topic I'm not aware of like ScavengerHunts? Oh, or maybe it's some kinda test? Is this how curie scouts for new scouts, by waiting for people to question the selection of this post?
Because really, and again no offense intended sir, try putting a gun to my head and I'm still not sure I could tell you why this post was chosen as to be featured as exemplary....I dunno...satire? Is that it? Yes, I actually did a double-take and checked to see again, if I somehow missed that it was posted in some other topic...nuhuh. It would have been far closer to making some kinda of sense (perfect sense really if you take the time to go through it) if this were chosen as satire for _______ (fill in the blank, because I really am not trying to be a prick to the author or anyone, not right now about this anyway).
C'mon now, stop it, will you please just point out what it is that I'm missing.
Because, otherwise, there's just no way anyone can defend this selection on the basis of its merits. Sure, I get that quality can be fairly subjective sometimes, but the having the slightest shred of authentic artistic integrity would be enough to compel anyone into agreeing, at the very least, on this particular case. And really, it's a shame that I even have to point this out.
How does this compare with the original intent of one of curie's own founders of, "ending the Steemit “circlejerk” on the front page"? Is this selection in line with curie's stated objective to bring "Rewards and Recognition to Steemit’s Undiscovered and Emerging Authors"?
Undiscovered, sure, possibly. But emerging? Not evident from this post. Deserving of recognition and rewards? Over some of the content I have personally seen get passed over? After watching my buddy actually write about and then publish his gratitude to curie's work? I guess I probably should've told him I tried to submit his stuff but space had to be made for this hidden gem of teh interwebz...well he's gonna know pretty soon now, hah.
And yea, I know i'm starting to go overboard now, and I figured out why. It's because I felt personally slighted by this, even though I'm well-aware there was absolutely zero intent in that regard. But it's also due to the fact that I actually tried, and took some of my own time to try to support the spirit of this community and, yes, my friends, which they would've understood perfectly if I had chosen not to due the a lack of effort or quality on their part (not at all a concern with these guys anyway). And, basically, I feel like I got played, and I'm not even entirely sure of what's going on really. Either way, I'm not at all unclear about why I was excited to join, learn about, and support the ideas and ideals of this platform, most of which I believe are very similar to what curie is supposed to be trying to pursue and/or achieve. But to describe this specific decision to pick this particular selection...
Antithetical, incompatible, irreconcilable.
The first words to surface. Anyway, I'm done. If this doesn't get through to the people at curie, or if the members of this community examine this honestly and fail find issue with it?
Then I'll at least I'll have gotten a straight answer.
.
.
.
.
update: Ok, so i looked through the guy's posts...they're almost all just reposts of youtube videos from a circle of alternative media channels. While I actually visit a lot of those channels and like their content, AGAIN, isn't that antithetical to the point of groups like curie? To find contributors of original content? I wanted to give curie the benefit of doubt, but this is just...ugh. what's the point? This is just going to go on and on, because people will just forget about it. Exactly the same as the real world -___-
.
.
.
.
another update: so 
