Geoma dao, one of the new applications that is carried out with blockchain technology is the realignment of the organization through the lens of highly distributed decision making.
The legacy of open source computing and highly distributed community projects provides strong DNA for expanding the potential of the blockchain from organizing facts and figures to shaping human systems into new, flexible, creative and rapidly changing forms. The growing need of organizations to quickly respond to changing circumstances and markets provides the impetus to adopt new and different approaches to make groups of individuals move in a coordinated manner.
Bring the Village
Open-source computing was born out of frustration over the growing corporation of developing computer software. Some of the original hackers who helped shape computer technology came from a rival culture that was almost hippie in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. One of these figures, computer scientist Richard Stallman, wants to apply a simple solution to a common problem: a stuck shared printer sends a message to everyone in the group, so someone can fix it. He discovered that the software for their new laser printer was 'closed' and was a property - which prohibited modifications. These and other efforts to limit information led him to create an open operating system, and helped bring about a movement towards a collaborative system.
Stallman was followed in the 1990s by Eric Raymond, whose essay 'The Cathedral and the Bazaar' served as a call to arm what he began to call the 'open-source' software movement, accompanying the release of his open-source operating system. Linux With open source, the source code (written instructions) of the software is published openly for use by anyone for free. However, the price that is socially understood is that if you make improvements, you must publish the fix back to the code so that others can use it. Instead of a proprietary software licensing model from companies like Microsoft, open source companies like Red Hat make money from the sale of services and solutions to improve the implementation of open source software.
This has led to several large-scale projects, which are hosted on shared repositories such as Github, with thousands of software developers around the world adding code and increasing the code base for the benefit of many people. The MIT license is one of the most popular open source software licenses that still exists today - a generally understood legal framework for how to manage intellectual property rights that accompany software projects.
Decisions about what is accepted into an open source code library are determined by the project maker. The three most common models, according to the Open Source Guide, are:
Benevolent for Life dictator: one individual, usually the one who comes with the project, makes a key decision
Meritocracy: the person who makes a meaningful contribution to the project makes key decisions and votes to implement change
Liberal Contributions: the most active contributors are currently pushing the process, and that is the process of building consensus (not pure voice) that implements change
These various open-source project management models are often considered and applied to blockchain projects, themselves often open-source.
Deadlock Blokchain
Variations on meritocracy and liberal contributions have been used in many blockchain projects, including bitcoin. Both produce unexpected consequences from hard forks as the output of democratic decision making behind blockchain governance.
Indeed, if we look at Bitcoin versus Bitcoin Cash, the first has a much larger market share than the others.
Organizational Decision Making
When we apply lessons and formulas from open source and blockchain to organizational management, we see an outline that emerges as to what responsive organizations will be in the future.
Why is this organization needed?
Technology adoption has been accelerated on a legal force curve (basically, the faster and faster with each new technology). It took a century for the telephone to reach 80 percent of the US market. It took about two decades for the World Wide Web to reach the same level. It only takes a few years for mobile internet to achieve the same penetration. With some size, the rise of bitcoin is even faster.
As the pace of change accelerates, we face the fundamental challenge that the way we organize ourselves, within groups and companies, does not follow the type of decision making, creativity, and flexibility needed from such structures in dealing with a rapidly developing technological environment. If a large organization takes one year to learn how to reorganize itself around a new opportunity, one or two years to act on that change, and a year to absorb how it operates in a new structure - a total of three or four years - how can one possibly discuss technology Who might reach the next broad adoption within twelve months? In three months?
Enter the Matrix
Many companies have adopted a "matrix management" system in which formal organizational charts are ruled out, and functional teams are formed drawing from people throughout the company to solve certain problems. People will be recruited and placed under the direction of an individual who does not need to write their annual performance review, but is assigned to guide their work for that particular project. This allows businesses to more easily adapt to new needs and focus on the skills and talents needed to meet those needs. Some matrix teams last for months or years; others are shorter, only for a few weeks.
Information systems struggle to compensate for human systems and human behavior crimes. This information friction has caused a number of cyber security failures, because it is easier for people to share passwords and logins than it is through the process of establishing one's formal access to short-term projects. Edward Snowden's violation of the National Security Agency's data system was largely made possible by his ability to convince more than two dozen colleagues to give him their security credentials under the guise of collaboration, stating that he needed their credentials in his role as a computer administrator. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Start-up companies must deal with the rate of change very quickly and respond to it. Many tend toward management models that are loosely coupled with individual autonomy and high-level decision making. Trying to apply conventional data models to fast-growing startups creates a number of challenges.
The advantage of truly empowered individuals is a greater sense of ownership and personal responsibility for work and results. Especially for millennials, who seek recognition and meaning in their work, the new concept of 'holacracy' holds a compelling promise to release the burden of hard work acting as a small cog in a very large machine.
Fully democratic organizations that seek to move with common goals in a competitive environment will face severe challenges, especially in times of crisis or pressure. At the same time, large organizations seek to reinvent themselves for a high-speed future with decentralized authority, give greater decision-making autonomy to individual and individual business units, and use computer intelligence systems to bring activities and actions together. coherent unity.
In the Zappo holacracy, internal work councils allow teams to send assignments and individuals post skills, create the ability to dynamically allocate workforce and empower people to highlight the training they need to expand or deepen their abilities. When I visited Zappos a few years ago and met with Tony, I saw an organization made up of people who exuded purpose and enthusiasm, and a leader who could see beyond the boundaries of the map.
Holacracy is perfect for the open-source world inspired by the blockchain. And blockchain, in turn, can help make holacracy more feasible. Now information systems and data governance structures can adapt themselves - thanks to smart contracts and the integration of DApps and AI with distributed ledgers - with dynamically changing needs and organizational structures of institutions.
A properly built AI agent can help mediate this reconfigured organization across the blockchain, automatically adjudicating what currently requires human intervention. Usually, when you move from one group to another, or are temporarily assigned to a project team, IT needs to change permission information that determines what data you access and how you access it. Sometimes this can take longer than the duration of the project that you are working on. The right type of AI engine can make this automatic. Data permissions can accompany this reconfiguration quickly, enabling better data security and better data utilities simultaneously. And in the era of distributed teams, spread across many geographies, a closely connected communication network can facilitate agility and smooth functioning.
Future organizations may or may not live on blockchain, but without question blockchain has the potential to make future organizations more effective. One of the challenges in decentralized decision making is the loss of coordination of activities. In complex systems this can cause congestion and chaos, because no one knows what the organization is doing or how their work fits into a larger whole, sometimes directing people to work cross-purpose.
The relatively fast coordination and dissemination of information made possible by the blockchain can help overcome some of these chaotic behaviors and adapt them to desired goals or outcomes, such as completing certain projects on time and in synchronizing with larger strategies. This can make organizations more agile and respond more effectively to the challenges of the rapidly changing business climate, with rapid reconfiguration.
For more information, please visit the link below:
Website: https://www.thegeomadao.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/thegeomadao
Telegram: https://t.me/geomachat
Linkedin: https://medium.com/@thegeomadao
Medium: https://medium.com/@thegeomadao
BTT Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2719369
ETH Address: 0xB50Ed04a80C1699441bB7a37a86374F42F22DE8C