I don't think stuffing the chain with 'data' has much benefit. We need users and actual content. I'll keep on doing what I do as it's fun.
I don't think stuffing the chain with 'data' has much benefit. We need users and actual content. I'll keep on doing what I do as it's fun.
We get to spend more on disk space! Isn't that what everyone wants to do?!?!?
I have wondered about this for many years. Will the technology that Hive utilizes support a huge user base? If a miracle happened and 1 million users appeared tomorrow, would everything still work? (Sorry I am not talking about specifics concerning the technology, but I am still pretty clueless when it comes to that. That's why I'm just trying to ask it in oversimplified terms).
It still works great but needless bloating for a tiny chain is not good.
Sorry for not clarifying. I didn’t mean in connection with this auto posting. I just meant in general. For a long time it seemed that the tech wasn’t there for a huge influx of real users (I mean going back like 7 or 8 years). That seemed to be the reason for not trying to attract content consumers. But if HIVE has the tech, I don’t understand why the community is not trying to bring in creators with a medium sized following- basically what looks like a big following on YouTube or TikTok or whatever those crazy kids use nowadays but is not enough of a following to truly monetize it. Someone who has a good following who would be happy getting $100 per day. And then perhaps use the community fund to supplement that. Encourage them to bring their followers over.
Hive can handle a lot more than it has now. It is just silly to create so much bloat for a handful of users.
As for why people are not bringing on users, because it is extremely difficult and time consuming. It is unlikely anyone will make $200 a day in post rewards consistently (required to get $100 in author rewards). Even that is t squat compared to what well known users can make elsewhere.
RE: Boiling down short form content on Hive