Stalking tools
The Blockchain not only remembers everything, it is also open to all. You can rummage around in the blog of another user, his "Comments" and "Replies" and unabashedly "spy on" his wallet. That's okay, that's what you want. Some users are pleased to have discovered a new hobby in it, others, such as @steemcleanersthis opportunity for their honorable Sisyphus work, Steemit "clean" to keep, a welcome relief.
It is also easier: Use eg SteemWorld! Here you will not only be shown when and by whom votes, comments and remittances go in or out, you can track exactly that and even more with other users. Now you can mercilessly pick out anything that does not suit you, "shoot it down" in comments, or drag it over something more secretive, such as chatting about it.
Everyone should know that, as well as the fact that there are people who do it.
In this regard, the colleagues are very sympathetic, who recommend the tools to you and afterwards wonder why the possibilities of these can be understood and applied quickly.
I have the opportunity to look at the activity of others, often used. I like to go to the tab "Recent Posts", according to the motto "Long heard nothing, what is actually driving ?" I have often found that I have gone through one or the other good article of "favorite authors" in the feed through the rag. When I mentioned this to an affected user, he banged me an ironic "stalker" to the head. In this context, I like to like such insults.
Vote strength
You can not only recognize incoming votes via SteemWorld, but also how strong it was.
I think it makes sense that users from a Steempower of 500 get a slider from the platform operators. From slightly higher sums, with everyone having to define themselves "higher" for themselves, as there are people who already get shiny eyes at 20 cent votes, others are tired of smiling at 20-SBD votes It is necessary to distribute his vote power wisely if you want to make several post and comment writers happy with the "money" that we do not own.
As an example I would like to call @ double-u , who has decided to up-vote in his weekly "pub-post" every comment, yes everyone, even for other pub people who do not talk directly to him. With more than 500 comments, this would not only be a decent piece of work despite the help of many open-minded guests, but his votepower would lull over weeks to zero, he would not regulate the strength.
There are so many examples of "heavy guys" who want to acknowledge the article or comment from fellow users, but their full vowel force would be exaggerated. As a rule, these "thick fish" also have to look through much more material from significantly more followers than we do with small whale feed elements.
But now just to this. SteemWorld gives you the ability to manually set your Vote power independently of your SP (here below 500). A simple arithmetic example: Your voting value equals 0.04 SBD at 100% refueling. If you manually set it to 25%, your vote will be worth 0.01 SBD, just as much, a little bit more than a brand new newcomer. Hm. Is something already? OK. Then even more clumsy: 50% of 0 is 0, 25% of 0 is also 0 and 10% of 0 is first 0!
Si, the smartass has studied math on magisterium.
Before you as a mini-Minnow, as I am also one, such a thing in the ears (I see it in the stalking tool), let it please and let me know your appreciation in the comment, which pleased!
delegation
Due to the recent increase in the level of fire problems experienced and quite SP-strong members of the German-speaking community have united as -support to support new users over time-limited SP delegation. Great idea, thank you again.
After I was so annoyed that I could not even love and respond to meaningful comments, I also applied with a short statement and received a delegation. I honestly wrestled with something before, it felt like scratching. It was probably scratching too, but I jumped over my shadow, because I know that with the newly acquired strength, which I do not own, I would like to serve the community to the best of my knowledge and belief (Stalkt me: Voting CSI ~ 0.00% self votes).
The attentive reader realizes: I have received a delegation. And I am so glad that I have received it from the user who may be reading here, although other stalking tools do not announce it by name. He justified his loan succinctly by saying that he likes my articles. The belated promise to handle the delegation carefully would not have been necessary, he would not expect me to do otherwise.
Other users linked their delegations with explicit conditions, which also apply to the delegations of the others and which should be self-evident: no self-votes, no circle votes and of course no cashout. The evaluation of double accounts, which are not identified as such, would have heard in my opinion, but perhaps one has assumed that the new new without stalking tool on such devious projects would not come anyway.
Partly very patronizing comments, in other Abusus the delegation would be withdrawn with immediate effect, let me flinch inwardly. Of course, these conditions and "warnings" only meant well, because something just does not belong, not the "Steemit morality" corresponds. Nevertheless, a very bad word shot into my head: censorship .
The censorship of the "powerful", the censorship of the rose-skinned in Orwell's "Animal Farm".
"Censorship", which is supposed to be available on all platforms, but not on Steemit, is worth a separate article, I wanted to briefly mention the small connotation of this great action.
Another bad word is capitalism , which is so badly banned here .
When I once mentioned that although I am not a "RL-Croesus" I could cope with an increase in my SP by the purchase of Steem purchase yet quite painless, but this would not want, because I feel the ambition, my "rise" on its own Achieving power, including the ability to accept a short-term gift, I got the answer: "Do that, then you have much stronger influence!" Alright ?!
Wallet
The capital and its power admirably allow the association "wallet". In your wallet (and in the wallets of other users) you not only get an overview of your wealth, you also see transactions, these usually provided with a memo. You see, who put what amount of coal in a Vote-Bot for each article, who sent to whom how much SP or SBD for profits, achievements or out of pure sense of community. Surely you can also recognize protection money payments whose existence is almost to be suspected, if the highly praised respectful dealings with each other, sometimes unfortunately heavily slime track adapted followers left behind, turns into completely different arrogant tones as soon as a user is in the care of an elite circle.
I would always encrypt such payments. You can encrypt your wallet memo by placing a hash (#) and a space () in front of the message. If a stranger looks into your wallet, he sees your referral, the addressee and the random characters. For the minimum amount of 0.001 SBD, you can exchange private text messages with other users outside the chat. Not only does this serve as a private gimmick, but it also enhances a sense of exhilaration when one sees how easily the number of Wallet agents can be challenged by such secrecy.
Ultimately, this tool is probably unfair, because we are all a big, open family. Oh, just like a family, which you reveal at the common breakfast table, to have your big sister while bathing again through the keyhole to have watched.
By the way, everyone escapes the idea that you donate the incredible amount of 0.001 SBD for the participation in a challenge to completely new users, without putting it on the big bell or offering more or less generous vote bots for foreign articles. Sorry, not a tool for ego-centrists.
