Often future based stories, movies and tv shows show the idealistic benefits of a single world government. The Federation in Star Trek is a perfect example of this. Rarely if ever do they discuss how the actual transition occurred as well and the assumed debates (or worse) that had to have taken place. Instead they just seem to magically have the structure in place with some form of benevolent leadership.
First I want to state that I personally don't have direct answers for this, but I can see some of the pro's and con's of such a One World Government. While I know this is a deeply passionate issue for many of you here, please keep your comments on point and no berating other users for their thoughts here.
Some of what I'm listing below are from my own thoughts, perceptions and concerns. Others are points I've heard in offline discussions or while searching these ideas on the internet. I don't expect us to come to a community decision on this, merely a good discussion for many of us to have.
Regardless of what the future of our world holds for us, the ability to communicate, especially with those holding opposing (subjective) viewpoints, is no doubt a requirement.
Advantages of a One World Government:
- Ability to deal with horrendous acts where the United Nations is typically to slow or completely unable (due to lack of consensus) to get things done.
- Increased efficiency of doing business with standardized regulations and compliance standards.
*Minimizing conflict over territorial disputes (assuming all land would be under this single control.) - No Lasting Wars
- Combined Technologies
- Accelerated Space Program
- Standardized environmental laws.
- Standardized judicial laws (at least the high level ones, since I'd assume that there would still be regional or municipal laws made and enforced.)
- Ease and increased speed to build up third world countries (can also be a negative incorporated into loss of cultural identities listed below.)
- Open travel/migration
Disadvantages of a One World Government:
- Homogenization of human language and/or culture and loss of individual cultural identities
- An even further separation of understanding between those in power and the 'everyday people' in many distinct societies
- Lack of keeping corruption and similar issues 'in check.' (i.e. If the One World Government is being led poorly, there's nothing on the same scale to counter it.) This could also lead to increased splinter/rebellious groups and conflicts.
- Ease of framing 'how the world is' on the perception of the general population, making it easier to sway people with propaganda and minimizing countering views.
- Sometimes universality is fair, and sometimes not. If you think of this in terms of risk tolerance though, it is far less potentially catastrophic to distribute government-related responsibilities to smaller states. If city X is badly governed, the poor decision-making is less likely to affect city Y or even country Z.
- General fear/distrust of a one world government.
Additional Reading/Views:
Pro's and Con's of a One World Government
World Government Debate
Should We Have a One World Government Debate
Should We Move Towards a One World Government Debate
Pros/Cons of OWG
Are you new to Steemit and Looking for Answers? - Try https://www.steemithelp.net.
Image Sources:
Federation of Planets