I can most assuredly guarantee you that Robert Malone didn't invent the mRNA vaccine as he so profusely keeps trying to convince people. He isn't even the first person who developed a protein response by insertion into the cells by transfection. He just happened to have made the production of the protein last longer than the previous attempt. It even states so in the study paper with his name on it.
procedure is the ability to transfect a wide variety of cell
types. For example, conventional DNA transfection protocols have generally resulted in rather low levels of expression
in hematopoietic cell lines such as U937, but the procedure
described here using RNA is very efficient
Five hours. By 2019 a study in mice for methylmalonic acidemia using mRNA called for repeat dosing during a twelve week study. The study on children who suffered from methylmalonic acidemia was cancelled when covid struck. But from what the overall view that is being experienced today with the vaccines isn't any different than what they found in the 2019 study with mice, repeated injections would be needed and the extended period of time producing a protein. The difference between the Moderna funded study on mice for methylmalonic acidemia and Malone is thirty years. So it's no surprise or shouldn't come as a surprise that within those thirty years Malone had already come to the conclusion that mRNA was not a viable tool for long lasting protein generation within the cells and announced such to the world. So does that make Malone an inventor of something? Not really, what that amounts to is someone sticking chocolate in peanut butter but unless you can bring it to a perfect peanut butter cup it doesn't really amount to anything other than a blob of chocolate in peanut butter. It's not like he hasn't had numerous opportunities to perfect his discovery, he has despite all his calls of having something stolen from him, that's why he feels comfortable warning the populace about mRNA while simultaneously proudly proclaiming he's an inventor of the technology being used. Except the fact that if he'd been granted a patent it'd done expired over a decade ago, that patent would have been based on what was depicted in the patent which had no mention of a probable use for vaccine development and the plain matter of the truth is is that RNA is not patentable exclusively as it is naturally occurring so however scientist in the future move forward using RNA has no reflection upon what Malone did, as one it would have expired and two it would have had to have been in similar formulation that he used and three it couldn't have been a naturally occurring substance that would have exempted it from any patented research use.
I think that, along with his alignment alongside Judy Mikovits, most logically could assume Malone was bearing the fruits of the forbidden tree. In essence what he was saying would be about as absurd as early pioneers in nanotechnology like Richard Feynman that all related discoveries decades later noted as originating from him and royalties paid henceforth. Feynman probably couldn't have even imagined electronic circuitry one day being used to probe the inside of a human body. Yet that is exactly what happened and was, or would have been, way above Malone's paygrade to have figured out why you can't just stick chocolate in some peanut butter and call it good. The discoveries of nanoparticles, nano-proteins and nanotechnologies is what pushed forward the intercellular activities and interactions of cell domains. Charles Lieber was one of those early pioneers in nanotechnology using circuitry to probe the inside of cells to find out what they were constructed of. Like oil and water some things just don't mix and that's why to avoid the deterioration of the cellular function you have to know what a cell is constructed of. He holds around fifty patents on intercellular research. His work is mind boggling, everything from tiny wire probes to what you could envision as super ultra tiny little submarines called nanotubes that over time he even patented what nanoproteins/metalloproteins it took to get the nanotubes to submerge into the cells unobstructed. Some of the work led to being able to identify or distinguish a sick cell, an old cell, a new cell, the type of cell all the way to piercing the cell to use as probes for sensing the state of the cell upon administration of or more biologically active agents. It also led to the discovery the apoproteins were good proteins to hijack and the use of graphene oxide was stronger or more stable when used in the Fe environment. It is upon the works of people like Charles Liebers, a man who was voted the top chemist in the world for the decade 2000–2010 by Thomson Reuters, based on the impact of his scientific publications that led to the development of drugs and drug deliveries including with the use of mRNA. The majority of Lieber's work was funded from within departments of the United States government up to and including the CIA, which I found rather unusual.
In January 2020 among the hype of the second impeachment trial of then President Trump and the ongoing speculation of a potentially deadly virus coming out of China Liebers was arrested for making a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement about his links to a Chinese university and failing to report income received from China on his tax returns. I would think if you were doing legitimate business one wouldn't feel compelled to be carrying loads of cash back to the U.S. in briefcases. Despite denials by the government there wasn't something more nefarious going on other's held claims there were but that was clouded in secrecy among government classified documents.
As highly noted a figure that Lieber was being Harvard University's head of chemistry and chemical biology one would think if this was really about him not declaring his work in China considering also the fact they even named the research center the Wuhan Harvard Research Center, it wouldn't have taken seven years of him doing such before they started investigating. Whatever role, if any, Lieber's may have contributed to the events that unfolded globally since his arrest at the start of the pandemic we may never know. What is of interest that may lead one to be inclined to believe there is more to this than what is being told is the recent rise the last few months of Robert Malone into main stream media. As mentioned above Lieber's arrest came amongst the hype of the second impeachment trial and impeding rumors of a deadly virus that left it relatively buried from the headlines. Since that time for the most part Malone was basically left obscured by the masses alongside people like Judy Mikovits as individuals carrying a bad case of butthurt. How exactly believable is it that someone, from over thirty years ago, an unknown in the world of science would rush onto the world stage making intellectual rape claims and that they, not the pioneers of science, who converged technology and science owned the mRNA technology. Sticking chocolate into peanut butter may make it taste good but it doesn't make it operate on a technological level, especially when that level didn't exist over thirty years ago. This is kindergartner entry level stuff in scientific comparison. In a it will leave you breathless comparison take ten, fifteen minutes to school yourself on the magnitude of difference we are talking about in this video's presentation of Biodiversity: The Genetic Takeover Of All Living Things starting approximately fourteen minutes in. It takes you through a brief history of how they've genetically sequenced the animal kingdom, the sequencing and modification of plant life and now are on the move towards humans despite not one viable study ever proven to work on animals let alone humans. Just because Moderna believes mRNA is the software to life does not make it so. A belief is something held, something someone believes to be true but doesn't necessarily make it true. I think that point is a well established objective of Malone but it by far does not gain him ownership of the technology nor does it make him the inventor of the vaccine. This is where it gets notably different.
Ever since Malone emerged, along with his wife and her six thousand word screed of how her husband suffers from PTSD ever since being intellectually raped thirty years by a professor who had a record of sexually assaulting his female students, his claim had always been he invented the technology behind the vaccines. As explained that that does not even come close in and of itself but the last few months have not only seen him being introduced by the media as the inventor of the technology but of the vaccines themselves and a lack on his part to differentiate the difference to the audience. In what would be an otherwise humiliating slap down by Glen Greenwald where he calls out Malone as having not been the inventor of the vaccines he persisted otherwise on a Laura Ingraham Fox News segment. Laura intercepted the argument but you couldn't really help wondering what exactly was going on here. It appeared that for whatever reason Fox, like other media pundits were trying to convey Malone as having invented the technology while knowing full well he hadn't but covering their tracks by bringing on Greenwald to challenge him. The intent definitely, by Laura intervening in the discourse, wasn't on if he was or wasn't lying but wanting to lead people to the perception there was some viability there while exempting themselves from a mistruth. If that wasn't the intent they'd just cut the segment as meaningless to the overall conversation at hand. Malone flat out lied on one of the largest cable providers of news and thus by not cutting that segment they gave him the platform to do it. Why? Why after months of being in the doghouse have we seen Malone paraded around everywhere? I think that answer may lay in an interview Malone did with Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Mattias Desmet on a video platform called Tommy's Podcast.
Malone, seen everywhere nowadays showed up on Tucker Carlson, it wasn't anything he said it was what he did that finally led me to look further into a man who was not only suddenly showing up everywhere but who before that I never got a real good read on him because you could never see his eyes, always dark, set back and squinty. Malone did quite a few eyebrow raises in that interview which than raised my eyebrows because it was totally uncharacteristic of him. Those raises were indications of "you understand a underlying intent that others don't need to be aware" followed by a head nod acknowledgement from Tucker. Those eyes wide open with the beady little darkness of the pupils shooting upwards waiting for that nodding approval told me there may be more to this. Overall I don't think Malone has nefarious intent in the current environment we find ourselves in but having waited his whole life for his fifteen minutes of fame was just to good to forego.
If you've ever listened to Malone for more than five minutes or read things he has wrote it sorts of obvious he's not a literary genius, maybe that's why his stints at science has led him to having had numerous jobs over his lifetime. Or maybe those numerous jobs and what knowledge he does have of science enabled him to become handy enough for the government. Who knows. But what led me to think about that option was something he said on the Tommy Podcast. That was that he was drawn to the theory of mass formation after having experienced it in a call he got from a CIA officers who was in Wuhan on January 4th so he got to experience it in the first person this excess focusing. He indicated he was also active on social media at the time.
These conditions existed up into the fourth quarter of 2019 and there was a seminal event which focused the entire world quite literally. I remember living through it online. I was at the tip of it because I got this call from Wuhan from a CIA officer on January 4th and I was active on social media. So I got to experience in the first person this obsessive focusing Mattias teaches about, which is exactly analog to thee focusing of an individual on an object moving, a watch, a spiraling graphic, these various tools that are used to elicit a state of hypnosis Mattias teaches in my learning of him, formation of a hypnotic state by obsessive focusing after having these pre-existing conditions. That would be personalization anxiety, etc., creates, can create the formation of a common bond around a cohort of a population that shares this obsessive focus on this event, and that one occurs they will identify with a leader and once that leader is identified, that leader can do no harm, can do no foul, anything that leader says or can do, because that leader is perceived as the source of the resolution of their psychological thing, their anxiety and free floating, and I am persuaded, I am just going to editorialize in my construct, cognitive dissonance and psychological pain are probably the biggest motivators of human behavior, particularly in a condition like this people will do extradentary to relieve the psychological pain that they may experience, that they may encounter.
From what I've read or listened to in podcast with Dr Mattias Desmet is that he draws a line within characterizations of current groups for a given example and refers to mass formations as developing leaders but no where has he laid it out so vividly exactly who one of those leaders may be. Even when coaxed further on in the interview to name the leader this sets Mattias back, a real put him on the spot moment. "Name the leader?" he exclaims back in disbelief of having been asked the question. A real do I look that retarded to you moment. Whereas have you not learned anything yet. They are leaders not a leader. These are mass formation groups, each side consisting of about thirty percent of the population, it usually consist of two opposing sides and about thirty percent of the population that doesn't follow the narrative of either side or may just act like they will go along to get along. These individuals also are not suffering from psychosis either as he gets further schooled for the second time evidently from Mattias. These individuals are more of in a hypnotic state, psychosis is a clinical term that can tend to offend people. Using psychosis can have a stigmatizing meaning, Mattias explains, and the use of the word can be counterproductive.
So why did Malone put an emphasis on an event that happened in late 2019 by obsessive focus in relation to that which he hadn't been schooled by Mattias on yet. This is like Malone saying this is what Mattias said but Mattias never said that. It's Malone describing in his own terms what is being unveiled according to current events, Mattias never laid it out in a time line format . Malone goes on to set out a similar line of thinking relating to current events when depicting the second and third mass, as a group that perceived a pre existing condition but instead of saying based on racism he refers to it as a period of time during history, and then describing the existence of the third group who goes along to get alone.
Then he speaks of a cohesion of a group, a crowd, around a set of events and this shared consensus that there was a pre existing failure of the normal world and a particular event, or epic group or some other alternative group or person which becomes the focus of thee attention and is perceived that the repression, rejection or killing of this alternative group, depending on which episode in history we are talking, becomes the focus of this leadership or the mass, the crowd that has formed, and what I find most intriguing about his teaching is that this newly formed crowd which may be as small as a third of a cohort with something like thirty to forty percent of the cohort being in this intermediate space kind of being a little bit passive, brought along, not feeling that they have to be invested in it but it's to much of a hassle not to resist but that cohort that has been formed will move through and, eh, Stalin being a notable example, Mattias has this excellent interview where he speaks about Stalinist Russia and the formed cohort representing Stalin's communist party, moved through extermination as documented by socialist and others, both the enemy cohort and than having consumed it turned on itself, what he has, I think he said eighty million, a large fraction of the communist party in Russia was consumed by this psychosis and because they had basically run out of targets. I was reminded of the Jacobites post French revolution where they turned on themselves and with a guillotine started chopping heads of members who were not sufficiently cured. So that's my understanding of history, teaching.
Lets examine how Mattias laid it out in another podcast he did:
Yes. So something very important, I think, is that for one reason or another, which can be explained. I’m writing a book in which I go into detail about this. But I don’t think we can do it now because it would lead us too far. But for one reason or another, the process of mass formation become stronger throughout the 19th century. And, for instance, Gustave Le Bon, who is one of the major scholars on the phenomenon of mass formation, warned us that in 1895 already that if the process would continue to become stronger, the process of mass formation, we would soon end up in a state in which the masters of the crowd would take over control in society. And that we would, according to Gustave Le Bon, experience the emergence of a new kind of state, a new kind of political apparatus. And that was exactly what happened in the beginning of the 20th century in the Soviet Union and the Nazi Germany. We saw this immense, this last large scale process of mass formation there. And then the objects of anxiety were the aristocracy in the Soviet Union and the Jews in Nazi Germany. And we saw that we saw how the masses emerged and how the masses were grasped in this specific narrative. And then how suddenly a totalitarian regime took advantage of this mass formation and started one of the most cruel episodes in modern history. With something with certain characteristics, like a totalitarian state is radically different from a classical dictatorship. And that’s very important. And the difference is this psychological process. Classical dictatorship is not based on mass formation, not at all. Classical dictatorship is based on a very primitive process of fear that a human being has for someone who is stronger, who is in power.
What we have here totally contrasts in the line of thinking with Mattias. Even back when I mentioned that Malone pressed Mattias on who the leader was Mattias responded the leaders are the experts. Mattias is under the impression we are dealing with a totalitarian regime not a leader who will rise to defeat the other side than eat it's own. As he points out there is a distinctive difference between a dictatorship and a totalitarian state. A dictatorship is not based on a mass formation process.
Yes, we are dealing with megalomaniac plans here. That’s the right word. I think not so much with psychopaths. That’s not true. People often say that we are dealing with psychopaths. I think we are dealing with megalomaniac plans, people who believe that they will solve all the problems in the world by imposing a new social system, which is, I think, the basic ideology of the system is transhumanist in nature. People who believe that problems can only be solved through technological control. I truly believe that this is what drives these people. This is their view on man and the world. And this is their idea on how the problems of humanity can be solved, which is delusional thinking, that’s not true at all exactly. This mechanistic ideal. This mechanistic thinking. This transhumanist thinking is the cause of the problems, because if we wonder why we ended up, before the Corona crisis, in this terrible mental state in which people felt socially disconnected, in which they experienced this lack of meaning making in which there was all this free floating attention, all this frustration, then we can clearly see that all this free floating anxiety and this frustration that it started to increase once the world became industrialized and mechanized. So this is very typical. While the mechanistic view on men in the world started to become predominant at the same pace, the free floating anxiety and also the social disconnectedness started to increase. And that’s why Hannah Arendt says that’s why the phenomenon of mass formation became increasingly strong throughout the last century because more and more people ended up in an isolated state. More and more people dealt with this free floating anxiety. So, I believe that the people who the large institutions who are in charge now and who actually tried to shape the future according to their own ideal image, well, I think that these people propose a solution exactly. This kind of discourse. This kind of things that caused the problem. Einstein said something very nice about that. You can never solve a problem by the same kind of thinking that caused it. That’s exactly what people try to do now, I think.
"I truly believe that this is what drives these people" these people not a dictator, a group of individuals involved in a totalitarian type takeover. "I think that these people propose a solution exactly. This kind of discourse. This kind of things that caused the problem". This sounds to me that we are being driven by whatever our anxiety or free floating frustrations may be into a coral all together by the powers that be not by a single entity but by a conglomerate of powers that exist to converge to the point of a totalitarian takeover. "That's exactly what people try to do now, I think", the people are being led to do it by their respective powers, people are being manipulated into a collusion course by a conglomerate of people who think they can transform the world into a better place. By destroying us or getting us to destroy each other they believe they can move forward in a better place. Even Donald Trump speaks to this when talking about the vaccines, one day he believes that the world will look back at him as a great leader who saved the world. Like Mattias stated we are looking at megalomaniac plans. When asked to name the leaders he said: "In this case the leaders are the experts, it's clear that the authority are situated now and the experts are the technocrats you can say. These people are pronouncing time and time again in the mass media and they believe in the underlying ideology usually but very often they don't believe in the exact narrative that they distribute, usually they are so fanatical that their ideology is what will save the world they feel it is justified to manipulate a little bit, to justify a little bit." We seen that in quite a few democratic leaders who time and again failed to follow their own mandates and protocols and we see it again in Trump who used Chinese investors to get his social media platform off the ground after having spent four years complaining that to make America great again we needed to invest in America and bring our manufacturing back home, that there was to much Chinese influence in social media and to much censorship from big tech but then uses big techs app also. They don't prescribe to their own ideologies as Mattias explains but they get away with keeping people trapped inside the formation by the constant voices of the leaders displayed repeatedly every day by the main stream media. The education level of individuals doesn't matter, everyone becomes equally stupid in a mass formation process:
Indeed, that’s exactly what happens in a process of mass formation. The individual disappears and the collective becomes absolutely predominant and erases all individual characteristics. It doesn’t make a difference whether the people involved, the individual involved are very intelligent or not intelligent. It doesn’t make any difference. Always the same happens. Everybody becomes equally “stupid” in a mass, and it doesn’t matter how smart or how intelligent they were before they lose all capacity for critical thinking. They lose all individual characteristics because they are really absorbed in this process of mass formation.
How do we break the cycle of mass formation, Malone goes on to explain it like this:
One of the the best ways to counter mass formation is for those against the narrative to continue to speak out against it, which serves to help break the hypnosis of some in the brainwashed group as well as persuade the persuadable middle to choose reason over mindlessness.
Which is what Mattias expresses, it is what he called quintessential to breaking the mass formation, once you try to defy what's happening now then we should stick to the principles of non violent resistance because that by far is the most efficient strategy he claimed. Once you try in as aggressive manner as possible to speak out you will focus the attention away from the formation and people will start to channel their free floating anxiety and frustration towards the dissenting voices. That's why they are radically intolerant of dissenting voices because they threaten to wake up the masses and masses who doesn't go along with the dissenting voices justifies to those masses committing atrocities, something they are incline to do. What Mattias doesn't do is advise that people focus on the tyranny which is what Malone seemed to indicate. What Mattias said was we are looking at megalomaniac plans, which could be conducive to a totalitarian state but he never advised people focus on the tyranny as Malone suggested:
Dr. Desmet suggests that for something as big as COVID-19, the only way to break the mass formation psychosis is to give the crowd something bigger to focus on. He believes that totalitarianism may be that bigger issue. Of course, after COVID-19, global totalitarianism may be the biggest issue of our time.
Mattias said for people to continue to speak out, connect and to think about a new normal than the new normal that led to the mass formation and always to stick to the principles of non violent resistance, because in as concise way as possible he could put it challenging those opposed to dissenting voice justified committing atrocities to them. He said we should do this in as convincible way as possible and that we should not hesitate. Given that focusing on the tyranny aspect keeps us focused away from finding a new path forward, that is as crucial aspect when we look at what Malone is saying verses what Mattias has said.
It appears Malone took what Mattias said and formatted it to a driven narrative, one held closer to one mass than the other. This doesn't help break up the mass it just consoles one side over the other so to speak. Let me show you what he did in that regard:
As many of you know, I have spent time researching and speaking about mass psychosis theory. Most of what I have learned has come from Dr. Mattias Desmet, who realized that this form of mass hypnosis, of the madness of crowds, can account for the strange phenomenon of about 20-30% of the population in the western world becoming entranced with the Noble Lies and dominant narrative concerning the safety and effectiveness of the genetic vaccines, and both propagated and enforced by politicians, science bureaucrats, pharmaceutical companies and legacy media.
What one observes with the mass hypnosis is that a large fraction of the population is completely unable to process new scientific data and facts demonstrating that they have been misled about the effectiveness and adverse impacts of mandatory mask use, lockdowns, and genetic vaccines that cause people’s bodies to make large amounts of biologically active coronavirus Spike protein.
These hypnotized by this process are unable to recognize the lies and misrepresentations they are being bombarded with on a daily basis, and actively attack anyone who has the temerity to share information with them which contradicts the propaganda that they have come to embrace. And for those whose families and social networks have been torn apart by this process, and who find that close relatives and friends have ghosted them because they question the officially endorsed “truth” and are actually following the scientific literature, this can be a source of deep anguish, sorrow and psychological pain.
It is with those souls in mind that I included a discussion of the mass formation theory of Dr. Mattias Desmet during a recent talk I gave in Tampa, Florida to an audience of about 2,000. As I looked out into the audience and spoke, I could see relief on many faces, and even tears running from the eyes of stoic men.
So it rather simple to see what he did there, he basically consoled one fraction of the mass. Probably why Mattias felt compelled to ask him to get him on the Rogan show so he could set mass formation into it's proper contexts as only in it's understanding in the proper contexts can you succeed at breaking up the mass formations and lead people forward in a new direction. Malone didn't get Mattias on Rogan's podcast because waking up the masses wasn't part of the objective involved, the objective was to move people forward in their perspective mass. As they often say in matters such as these it's all about the timing.
Trump was a big one on the timing of things. When asked to produce the paperwork necessary to move his second impeachment trial forward his response was the timing wasn't right yet. Looking back over the events of the last two years I look at that moment now in regards to the impeachment process keeping the masses focused on the impeachment antics while they implemented the final preparations to release the virus. I always wonder if this explains how during being impeached he found the time to set up navel bases to bring people home from China and the masterfully crafted plan to ensure a food roll out across the country in such an exemplary fashion without anyone noticing what they were up to. The same can be said of Malone and his entry into all of this, it was all about the timing.
What I find particularly odd or questioning is the timing of the sudden emergence of Malone on mainstream media after having spending months off into the background noise. His emerging appearances started around three weeks prior to Charles Liebers trail. Now the topic of the mass formation focus wasn't on Charles Liebers but the masses discussing their diagnosis by Malone that they suffered from psychosis, which Mattias has explained a mass formation is not a psychosis, it's just a mass formation, if there was a term properly fitting of it it would be hypnosis not psychosis. In relation to the timing of events around Charles Liebers that were publicly notes, his arrest and his trail, that Malone puts himself into this time frame by his sudden emergence and by mentioning that on January 4, 2020, the time period Liebers was arrested, he got a call from a CIA officer in Wuhan. The topic of that call, as Malone indicated, was the CIA officer feeling as though he was caught up into a mass formation as Malone indicated this was the first person he experienced the event unfolding with. By January 4, 2020 the vast majority of people in Wuhan had if not an outright knowledge a deadly pathogen was about they had a pretty good idea something wasn't quite right so to lay claim that a CIA officer stuck in Wuhan with a deadly pathogen circulating wants to chat about being under the spell of a mass formation just doesn't jive with me. The fact you could remember the exact date of such a casual conversation doesn't either.
Now I know I am just speculating on this but speculation sometimes is all you have to awaken to a truth. As an example look at how many conspiracy theories have been proven true in the last year. I am more inclined to believe that if Malone isn't a CIA agent himself that chances are pretty good he could be a CIA operative. That could explain his rather lengthy list of job employments over the last twenty years that I mentioned, they could have been used as cover. It might be plausible that Malone was called in to distract cover away from Liebers arrest but the impeachment trial antics pretty much kept it contained. Malone laid on the down low until it was time to start parading about making claims of his technology being stolen. Which was his initial claim all along up until near Liebers trail which went from stolen technology to outright claims he invented the vaccine. It was also during this trial period Malone was advising people to focus on the tyranny while simultaneously the media started hyping up depictions of tyrannical displays across the globe. Coincidence? I am not inclined to believe such anymore, there's just been way to many coincidences the last two years being somehow conveniently explained away. There are only two common denominators shifting our focus away from the virus and the vaccines, that's the mass media and Malone, in a direction that keeps us encapsulated into the mass formations, striking at our fears, heightening our anxieties and leading us further into frustration.
I am not trying to be the bearer of nefarious intent by Malone or Liebers because the truth behind what transpired in Wuhan is still unknown. What is known is that a beautifully gifted mind such as Liebers doesn't even come close to someone who stuck chocolate in peanut butter and it's not just a immense insult to someone so scientifically gifted it's a genuine insult to the rest of us for them trying to lead us to believe such. There is a reason for such, we may never know but we will never find out as long as we continue to let them keep us in a mass formation. As hard as it may be for some people to want to admit but breaking the chains of this mass formation starts with questioning the actions of the individuals we place(d) our trust in.
Referenced links:
(Highly recommended to watch the video or read the outline)