Remember when the government came out with a vaccine that programmed your body to create its own immunity. Neither does anybody else became it never happened. What the vaccine really did was switch up the body's immune response to tolerate a virus instead of eliminate the virus, but as far as creating immunity it didn't happen. At least not in any traditional sense of how prior vaccines worked for decades. Imagine also that the government not only lied about the vaccine creating immunity but to justify the use of a new vaccine technology they told you that the standard way a vaccine was produced using eggs couldn't be used because the virus wouldn't incubate in eggs only to find out down the road it incubates just fine in eggs. Now imagine you find out what some had know was a crucial step using this new technology they skipped in the rollout but are now acknowledging that crucial step in order to justify more vaccines using that technology. How much farther would you be willing to trust them again, especially given that what they are describing to you has already been described as accomplishable, yet the results of studies haven't been done yet to ensure the end results of them trying to run that past you again that they can create immunity or cure diseases. That is exactly what they are trying to do with the promise of cancer cures using AI technology the same as they did with the promise of mRNA technology vaccines producing immunity.
"Now we can go see what's screwed up in a patience and we can use that information to make a vaccine. We take that information, say a patient with lung cancer, we take a biopsy, we figure out the sequence, we figure out their immune system, that all becomes information that goes up into the cloud that combines an algorithm then automatically makes a vaccine that we administer to try wake their immune system. Now the challenge, of course, is that everybody's cancer is different. Mutations happen by random chance so in order to do this you have to make it personalized. So this is me, (silhouette pops up on a screen), but if every patient is different (silhouette's in different colors pops up behind him) what we're going to have to do is make a personalized vaccine for every patient."
In the recent news release on AI ability to cure cancers, here's how Oracle chairman Larry Ellison describes that process.
"Larry Ellison explained that tiny tumor fragments can circulate in a person's blood allowing for the possibility of early cancer detection through blood test. AI could be used to analyze these test and identify cancer early on. Once the cancerous tumor is gene-sequenced, an individual vaccine could be created for each patients using AI, the mRNA vaccine could be produced robotically in just 48 hours, offering rapid and personalized treatment."
"Ellison emphasized the incredible potential of AI in advancing cancer care, envisioning a future of early detection, personalized cancer vaccine and their rapid production could become a reality within just two days. This vision represents the immense promise of AI for the future of medicine."
The statements describe the same thing using different words. AI is going to produce the algorithm described in Tal Zak's description not make the actual vaccine, all vaccines are produced robotically by the pharmaceutical companies, there is nothing new here being described except the pharmaceutical company's being able to rush out a vaccine for one individual, how cost effective will that be to encourage them to want to develop a robotic means to produce a vaccine as easily as pushing a button on a soda machine with hundreds more selections to chose from to have it delivered within two days. This is why doctors have said that AI isn't going to be of any use to them because, outside producing vaccines for multiple different cancers based upon a person's cancer and immune response, which would come at an astrominical cost, they already know how to do all the other stuff described.
If there's a silver lining in all of this, is the fact that they have known all along that the use of mRNA technology has to be personalized for each individual, yet they forwent this important distinction causing multitudes of vaccines injuries and death in the mRNA covid vaccine rollout. This serves as their self admission of such.