Because of the substance and length of the work, I will attempt to comment as I go. I may misaddress issues that are later resolved as a result.

"...this chapter is not a thinly veiled anti-semitic rant..."

So much to address here. Semitic refers to a language family, including Hebrew and Arabic. Palistinians are Semites while many modern Israelis aren't, being native English, Russian, or Polish speakers. Anti-semitism therefore is not antijewism, and I believe that you are intending to state you aren't antijew. However, Talmudic and Cabalistic teachings clearly justify moral opposition, and the present conquest of the world will continue until nominally prevented, and that depends on opposition. I hope I have understood the basis and reason for your comment, including the reference to semitism that is deliberately imposed by the enemies of humanity concealing their guilt by that ploy of using Jews as scapegoats.

"...morality becomes increasingly subjective..."

I perhaps lack context here. To the researcher in the occult? In religious institutions accumulating corruption over time? Are you referring to the variable morality of the variety of spiritual traditions, to the corrosive effect of researching occult history and practices on humble researchers, or what?

"Identifying and doumenting how the Freemasons had been infiltrated by the Illuminati..."

Despite the repeated editing and proof-reading you have clearly undertaken, you missed the typo above, just above the whirling cockactrice in the snippet of illuminated manuscript, about halfway through the OP.

"The supreme court was funded by the Rothschild Foundation and Dorothy de Rothschild."

Without following the link, it is unclear which supreme court you mean, and what was funded. The architectural design and construction of the Supreme Court of Israel, at least, is shown to be funded by the Rothschilds.

"In 1982, on the eve of Rabbi Schneerson’s birthday, then President Regan..."

Another slippery typo, quickly followed by another:

"“He has provided a vivid example of the eternal validity of the seven Noahide law, a moral..."

Seven is a plurality, but because of the quotes the origin of the typo is unclear.

"...Esformes, who was involved in a 1.3 billion Medicare fraud."

1.3 billion shekels?

"A mendacity that deconstructs a singular duplicity into two false dichotomies that are luring us toward the age of manufactured chaos and catastrophe."

This statement well affirms my assessment.

I strongly concur with your assessment of collectivism as intended to replace humanism. I note that I am born inherently sovereign, that adherents of Abrahamic traditions err to ignore by advancing collectivism, as it is not societies that are inherently sovereign, but persons. Thus, when I assert my sovereignty, I do serve that ultimately vastly greater Creator than myself, and belief that collective, or Communitarian devotion serves that greater good is false. Rather that collective is particularly the greatest threat, the most present and potent enemy of the greater good, and the feeble intellect even the best of men can bring to bear unequal to the task of divining the true impact of what is available to them to judge.

It is informative that the occult bases for the transnational drive to the incipient global government are ubiquitously covert, dazzled by their hubristic epistemologies, and have deliberately conflated evil with good, sin with holy, and profane the sacred.

I have come to realize that the Christian principle is basic to society of sovereign persons, while antichristian the institution, as the former are born, feel, and die, while the latter do not, and further, ubiquitously accumulate corruption with inevitably apocalyptic results.

A basic grasp of the reality of institutionalism is that stated principles are deceptions, as you state above, luring the naive into feudalism serving only corrupt overlords, the actual worst governance humanity could suffer. The affliction of corruption cannot be prevented by people, as history shows has precipitated the destruction of every empire without exception, and the best of them within 10-20 generations. Lesser such institutions don't outlast their founding tyrant, as they have no capacity for succession.

Natural societies cognizant of the fact of individual sovereignty yet persist beyond history, as people adapt to exigent circumstances by their inherent authority to implement policies over themselves, or are excised from society by the failures of their policies. Where the natural world devours failures, societies succeed by the merits of their members whom succor their loved ones, while corrupt overlords consume their societies when exigence renders them vulnerable.

It is the reality that individual sovereignty underlies the success of society by that fraternal affection, while institutionalization disempowers affection and interposes pathological corruption, parasitic and inevitably terminal. The former requires humility to fully implement, cognizance of our absolute sovereignty in a state of inadequacy to judge competently for other, free persons, while hubris and false conceit leads along a broad avenue of sophistry to the latter.

Adoption of modern distributed means of production by people with the merit to carry their weight will enable sovereigns to succeed the imposition of global technocratic totalitarian tyranny because of the fundamental duplicity corruption imbues it with. It is Providence that has facilitated this potential by so implementing physics to provide emergent technologies just in time. Because of the lack of maturity of decentralized means of production, their implementation will be unpredictably diverse, and undertaken by the best of us, whom will merit their blessings by themselves producing them, demonstrating the fundamental reality of individual sovereignty underlying the greater good.

Today I have been utterly displaced, my miraculous retention of my personal property solely because of the affection and courage of my friends and neighbors. Even as the disastrous imposition of digital ID is underway, the very threat it clearly poses creates potential to prevent being enslaved by it that my sudden displacement has prepared me to implement insofar as I have merit to do so.

I doubt I would have demonstrated the prescience to so suddenly abandon the place I had built and lived in for eight years, and my resistance to that peril likely to have been insufficient absent the brutal predation of the corruption that has eradicated it. Providence alone has made opportunities of catastrophes, and left my prosperity potential as per my merit in utterly unpredictable ways that have only become available because of the cruelty of the enemies that have financially attacked out of the blue.

Insofar as I can grasp your thesis, I exactly and specifically demonstrate in my personal and present circumstances the robust truth of it.

Thanks!

Edit: this post should be required reading in every grade of public school. It's detailing issues fundamental to our sovereignty, prosperity, and perhaps even our survival.