Hey ! Thanks for reaching out. I actually appreciate the question.
To clarify: I’m currently testing a high-performance curation and anti-spam tool I’ve developed called Hive Scout. The bot is programmed to detect 'Frequency Attacks' (accounts broadcasting multiple operations in a very short window). Because you are a high-effort editor and updated this post 7 times in an hour, the algorithm flagged the frequency of the broadcasts.
I totally understand the frustration—ironically, I also receive regular 2.5% downvotes from Spaminator myself. I know exactly how it feels to be caught in an automated filter while trying to contribute.
My apologies for the 'friendly fire'! This is exactly why I am running these tests with such low weights (3%)—I'm trying to build a tool that is more precise than what's currently out there. These 'edge cases' help me teach the code to distinguish between bot spam and real human effort.
I’ve already updated my local Safelist so the Scout ignores your edits moving forward. I'm actually about to drop a full post on Sloth.buzz explaining the 'Hive Scout' project, the logic behind these frequency shields, and sharing the 10-day mute list I've gathered. Keep up the detailed work!
..... Also replaced my diwnvote wd an exact upvote.
RE: "Krotus Computer & PCGH: Wenn Preise wichtiger werden als die Wahrheit – Eine Chronik der Zensur" /// Mensch-KI Beitrag! :-) SECHS mal Zensiert in einer Stunde!!!