In recent years, a loud voice has emerged that calls for "non-reproductive" .. The owners of this current believe that marriage is a good thing, but they are against the idea of procreation at all. While some married people live in a state of sadness due to the delay in having children, this current goes in the opposite direction: they have the ability to have children, but they refuse.
The reasons are many, and most of them fall within the principle: Why do I bring to life another person in which the two suffer, suffer, and be subjected to great dangers and suffering, just because I am a selfish person that I love to have children for my entertainment and my feeling of parenting. While he suffers from the crisis of "existence" with all his problems later: crises, problems, diseases, need, confusion, depression, surprises, etc.
This trend is amplified when its owner mainly lives in a volatile society. Will I have children who live in a country like this where the unemployment rate is the highest level, the rate of education is declining, poverty and need are everywhere, and news of harassment, rape and crises do not stop, and health crises prevail .. Is it fair to have children who live this tragedy completely, especially if The idea of immigration or improvement was not available at the near level?
Rather, it goes beyond that by mentioning some concerns of a global nature. I read to someone from a period of time an opinion saying that he was in pain for the idea of having children suffering in the two global warming waves with the devastating effect that will carry with them fatal droughts and huge rises in the temperature and drowning of cities, etc. Appear strongly in the middle of the current century.
In general, what do you think about this "non-reproductive" approach? .. with or against ? And why?