Yes. Perhaps it costs 300,000,000 USD before people understand the potential of open sources greatest risks. Imagine, source code that’s available for anyone to edit. But, how do you revert what’s been edited. Quick hypothetical; Man A pays for a server. Man B sets up the server. Man A is a noob that sources to programmers. Man B sets up all his friends with hosting to store information on Man A’s server. Man A has no idea. But, Man B has created a serious flow of cash banking on the ignorance of Man A. Man A goes broke after terrorists hack his website, his phone calls are intercepted when following up on hack reporting after additional hack, and the Bitcoin was born in the meantime. Man B’s girlfriend is a source coder storing repositories on Man A’s server. It’s January 2017 and Man A is done trying to crowd fund his business hacked by terror. Man A knows his email still functions and there is no additional payment required to sustain the gmail backed email storing documents + emails. The admin account allows for a shut off of email privileges. Man A tests the “shut off” mysteriously at the time 200,000,000 USD BTC is lost for two days. Within those two days, years ago now, the news breaks and Man A says to himself; “Was it me? Was it a hidden email on my server? If I turn the access back on will the BTC return?” Man A turns access back on two days later. The BTC has returned. But, two founders couldn’t take the heat of the loss. A Bitcoin founder and SwissCow founder have perished. Had they waited, perhaps they would be rich today. However, further down the line 2017 Bitcoin for Man A seems like a good idea to get into. Previous, Man A in 2012 had a plan for virtual coins offering percentage of business (non controlling) in exchange for start up funds. However, at the time it’s a step in the plan never reached due to the hacks mentioned. Somewhere along the line a court asks a politician for emails. By hunch Man A says; “What If? And, shuts off email access once again.” The emails can’t be found and the political character loses the big election. Man A thinks it’s far fetched to consider that “shut off” had anything to do with the politician. Man A elects to wipe the server completely. Man B’s girl is upset because the ghetto set up costs her all her intellectual property. If the server was backed on domain and set up through google. Google says; “Are you sure? There’s no way to get info@aircraft-shop.com back once deleting. Man A says; “I’m done trying to fund the LLc back to business. Yes. Wipe it.” Imagine, source code that doesn’t have a backup deleting a few hundred million? Would anyone think to recall the information by way of existing back up data that may offer previous information on GitHub may exist in the backup? Man A suspects that nearly every Man A and Man B team have been poached, the intellectual properties of freedom stolen, and everyone brushes his rants under the rug. Perhaps, Devops199 noob mistake is a cover for a community out of all contracts with previous source due to wipe of previous server created for his www.aircraft-shop.com. Perhaps, all the innovators weren’t so lucky. Perhaps, the innovators that exist in the hypothetical stripped of their intellectual property can actually code and catch the hackers to rob the property. But, when that’s the suspect Man A is lucky to have outsourced. Is there a GitHub backup that can offer the implementation that previously existed? Imagine, Man B gets dumped by his girlfriend as a result. Man B goes buck wild and elects to jack up GitHub source in his madness. The previous Bitcoin contracts source from Man A’s server is never coming back. Man B messes up all the source on GitHub that he can change. If there isn’t a backup or method of backup recovery. What does it mean for open source? When the Venture Capital Man C gets a hold of the “API to the moon” and the pitch is hardly effective at describing soups within the soup book. Man C curiously scratches his head thinking; “You should know about your own soup.” What does it all mean?