You’re trying to reduce a forensic accounting tool into “a list sortable by HP” because that’s easier to dismiss.
Yes, a sortable HP list is trivial. It also answers almost nothing about DHF-driven issuance.
This dashboard measures something very specific:
Which proposal support actually authorized DHF payouts
Who received DHF HBD (primary)
Where that money flowed next (secondary, including labeled exchange exits)
All over rolling windows, with assumptions disclosed.
On “biased formulas”: that’s not a critique, it’s a feeling. If you think a rule is wrong, name it. Otherwise you’re just asking for the fog back.
On your concrete example (worldmappin #313): you were right to flag it. We had a calculation bug in the attribution pipeline.
Corrected result: your attributed amount for that proposal in the measured window is 316 HBD, not 57.
Bug fixed, dataset rebuilt.
Separately: your 
And the “irony” line (“criticizing inflation while asking funding”) is just rhetoric. Hive already issues via the DHF. Measuring who authorizes issuance and who captures it is basic governance hygiene.
If you want to debate the model: debate the mechanics.
If you want the fog back: just say that.
RE: Who Is Printing Hive, Who Is Getting Paid, and How Much?